Take the 2-minute tour ×
Space Exploration Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for spacecraft operators, scientists, engineers, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I read this essay by Neal Stephenson recently: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2011/02/space_stasis.html

which makes the case that had we not been locked-into chemical rocket technology through years of investments, other approached may have been more viable.

As of today, what non chemical rocket technologies appear to be the most promising for the future of space travel?

share|improve this question
    
Related: space.stackexchange.com/questions/51/… –  gerrit Jul 18 '13 at 10:40
    
Nukes... (meaning NTR, of course, and more involved approaches). –  Deer Hunter Jul 22 '13 at 20:06

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

There has been a lot of researching regarding Non-Chemical Rocket propulsion Systems. The most recent one being beamed thermal propulsion. It involves propelling a rocket by using microwaves from the ground. Here you can find more Systems which have been researched on. Some have already been used, such as the Air Launch, where rockets are launched from conventional horizontal-takeoff aircraft, to carry satellites to low earth orbit. Also some other examples are: Static Structures: Space Elevators, Skyhook Dynamic Structures: Space Fountain, Orbital Ring And Mechanical Systems such as Pneumatic launchers.

This table gives the estimate build cost, the technological readiness for most of these Non-Rocket Space launch Methods.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.