Space Exploration Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for spacecraft operators, scientists, engineers, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why are petrol and diesel not used as rocket fuel like kerosene ? Which properties make them unfit for use in rocket fuel ?

share|improve this question
Related: Could I home-brew my own rocket fuel? – called2voyage Mar 24 '14 at 18:23
I share the same views as the others who answered this question. I think you might find this link useful- – V Pradeep Mar 27 '14 at 12:50
Can't post an answer because the question is locked but this book is a great account of the development (and misadventures) of developing rocket fuels. All the answers you seek are here – Daniel Nov 23 '14 at 23:06
The first liquid-fueled rocket was lofted by a LOX/Gasoline engine designed by Robert Goddard – Nick T Mar 14 '15 at 0:44

I'll try to find a source for this, but it is my understanding that in the early days of rocketry (read: 1950's, in this context), engineers tried to use jet fuel (and probably other fuels), but the way the fuel was produced led to large variations in thrust and specific impulse from test to test.

Basically, they'd fuel up the rocket engine (on a test stand), light it up and measure the thrust. Then they'd do it again, and they would get a substantially different thrust. This led to a specification called RP-1 (Rocket Propellant 1) which dictates that any fuel carrying the designation of RP-1 must have a certain level of various impurities (e.g. sulfur) and no more. This specification is tighter than specifications for jet fuel and other hydrocarbon fuels.

EDIT: The wikipedia page on RP-1 [1] gives a more detailed description of what I said, although they attribute the problems more directly to problems with cooling the engine.


share|improve this answer
According to John Clark in Ignition!, the problem with JP-1 and relatives is that there are multiple mixes of hydrocarbons that will meet the specs of JP-1, and rockets are rather touchy about the exact makeup of their fuels. Thus, RP-1, which specifies things like how much of which isomers of which hydrocarbons are permitted. – Mark Mar 25 '14 at 4:47
@Mark - think there's a separate answer in there. – Deer Hunter Mar 25 '14 at 5:04

Goddard's early liquid-fueled rockets starting in 1926 did use gasoline (petrol) as the fuel, because it was easy to obtain. RP-1 kerosene is just an optimization - cleaner and somewhat more efficient.

share|improve this answer

Rockets work differently to internal combustion engines. It is easier to cool an engine than it is to cool a rocket, due to the scale and usage of the exothermic reactions. rockets use specific propellants that are tested for their purity. Car engines can have fuel that have some impurities because it is ignited intermittently and is used to transform chemical energy into kinetic energy. Most Rockets ignite their fuel constantly and the resulting release of force from the chemical energy pushes the rocket away from the aperture of the rocket, even in vacuums.

share|improve this answer

protected by Community Jul 30 '14 at 10:05

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.