Timeline for Why are spacecraft qualification tests expensive and time consuming?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 20, 2015 at 22:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/678711094005915648 | ||
Dec 18, 2015 at 0:03 | vote | accept | user11377 | ||
Dec 17, 2015 at 0:13 | answer | added | Puffin | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 12, 2015 at 15:51 | comment | added | honeste_vivere | Here's a couple of problems that are not issues in labs on Earth: a) you cannot cool things with a fan in space; and b) there is no electric ground to connect to so your spacecraft will charge up (positive and negative, depending on location, etc.). It is incredibly difficult to make things work well and fast without running into problems relating to these two issues alone... | |
Dec 12, 2015 at 6:13 | comment | added | Fred | To add to Brian's comment, space vehicles & launch vehicles tend to be one-off items that take time & a lot of money to assemble - there is no mass production assembly line making them. When everything associated with space vehicles is expensive, rigorous testing is required to minimize the chances of equipment failure & financial loss. Rigorous testing just costs lots of money. Also people are always pushing the envelope to achieve higher productivities. It all adds to the costs. | |
Dec 11, 2015 at 21:57 | comment | added | user11377 | How should I edit the question to make it more specific? Maybe ask about a certain class of spacecraft like cubesats? Or rockets below a certain payload lift to LEO? | |
Dec 11, 2015 at 18:15 | comment | added | Brian Lynch | Testing for space flight hardware is expensive and demanding simply because it needs to be so much more robust and complete compared to any other industry (including things like aircraft and nuclear power). The reason for that is because you can't exactly go fix something in space -- Hubble and ISS are exceptions but in general you don't have much of a chance for repair and servicing (for now). | |
Dec 11, 2015 at 9:11 | review | Close votes | |||
Dec 12, 2015 at 14:54 | |||||
Dec 11, 2015 at 8:51 | comment | added | GdD | This is really too broad, you could write a book on this topic. | |
Dec 11, 2015 at 2:25 | history | asked | user11377 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |