Given that we could achieve getting this much mass into LEO, getting it to break orbit and out into interplanetary space is that much harder; going to Mars using a Hohmann transfer orbit takes about as much delta-V as getting to LEO in the first place, so all the fuel expended to get the craft and its water shield into space has to be brought up into orbit, requiring exponentiallymany more launches. Using a gravity assist, say from Venus, would be a logistical nightmare requiring all three planets to be in alignment as of departure from LEO, and while it would save fuel it would require us to cover much more distance and take much more time, possibly placing the mission further beyond our current capabilities.
'exponentially' implies a mathematical exponential relationship between the mass of the fuel needed to escape LEO and #of launches. This isnt the case as described, however, one only needs about 2x the fuel required to get some mass to LEO. That's a linear relationship not exponential
Nathan Tuggy
- 4.6k
- 5
- 36
- 44
There was a calculation error, where the cylinder volume calculation had become 4 times bigger, in that the original calculation stated DIAMETER squared times pi times cylinder height, while, it is in actual sense the RADIUS which is squared, then times pi, and cylinder height / [email protected]