Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 25, 2018 at 14:18 vote accept Amar
Sep 12, 2018 at 16:31 comment added uhoh @Hobbes so I've just asked Do some solid rockets burn faster at the bottom? What's an extreme case?
Sep 12, 2018 at 11:25 comment added uhoh @Hobbes there are several designs for the way solids burn and it's not necessarily 100% one or the other. However only the longitudinal difference makes any difference in this context.
Sep 12, 2018 at 8:34 comment added Hobbes @uhoh, solids burn from the inside out, not so much bottom-up. You want the outside to remain covered in propellant until burnout.
Sep 8, 2018 at 16:10 comment added Russell Borogove @uhoh Liquid stage CM moves downward; overall rocket CM tends upward (because of upper stages and payload). Solid boosters have some extra weight at the base (nozzle) that I imagine outweighs the nosecone, so their CM should also move down very slightly.
Sep 8, 2018 at 15:42 comment added Organic Marble Fun fact: a full shuttle external tank's propellant tank CG is pretty much at its geometrical center, and so is an empty one's. So during launch there is a minimum longitudinal CG that then jumps back up. I remember calculating where this inflection point was, long ago.
Sep 8, 2018 at 15:20 comment added uhoh Would there be a tendency for the CM of liquid fuel rockets to move "downwards" along the axis as propellant is consumed, while for solids, if at all, the CM might move "upwards"?
Sep 8, 2018 at 14:59 history edited Russell Borogove CC BY-SA 4.0
added 69 characters in body
Sep 8, 2018 at 14:39 history answered Russell Borogove CC BY-SA 4.0