Timeline for Is there an end-of-life policy for Martian satellites?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 3, 2018 at 5:07 | comment | added | uhoh | You can also check links found in those posts and search for language that addresses things that burn up, and may not burn up, in Mars' atmosphere. | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 5:07 | comment | added | Hunting.Targ | I thought of that - even though guidelines are not the same as standing policy, I think I will take your recommendation. THX again. | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 5:02 | comment | added | uhoh | Edit looks great, thanks! Yes non-existence proofs are hard, but space agencies leave a fairly extensive paper trail on the internet, and its possible that existing material on planetary safety address this with language about fragments that may survive reentry. I'd say a good way would be to look at the planetary-protection tag here (13 questions) or just search for "planetary protection" on this site for starters.(49 results) | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 4:57 | comment | added | Hunting.Targ | True, and thank you for the reminder; the non-existence of something is rather difficult to verify, especially an abstract policy rather than a program or a piece of hardware across various agencies that do not communicate well with each other, when they do at all. | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 4:56 | comment | added | Hunting.Targ | fair enough; edited. | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 4:55 | history | edited | Hunting.Targ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
shortened for relevancy
|
Dec 3, 2018 at 4:23 | history | answered | Hunting.Targ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |