Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 15, 2023 at 19:50 comment added Loren Pechtel @Peter-ReinstateMonica You still have the problem with there being no gas which is safe in the lungs. Perhaps you could fill the lungs with fluid and handle gas exchange by other means.
Feb 14, 2023 at 22:15 comment added Peter - Reinstate Monica This is it. The question aims at mechanical effects of high pressure ("skin rupture etc.") which do not exist: The human body is very much like a water balloon with a few bones in it which is happy at any depth, even though it is mechanically very weak. The problem are the chemical and biological effects of gases at high partial pressures. If, as a gedankenexperiment, the blood could be oxygenated outside the body in an artificial lung, the problems would disappear, I suppose.
Jun 6, 2022 at 23:15 comment added Loren Pechtel @Uwe No--high pressure liquid. The current human depth limit is due to toxicity of the breathing gases as pressure goes up, go deep enough and there's no gas that's safe to breathe. However, there are liquids capable of dissolving enough gas--there have been demonstrations of small animals surviving them. However, square-cube interferes, human lungs wouldn't be able to inhale/exhale it. The problem is mass, not viscosity.
Jun 6, 2022 at 17:45 comment added Uwe If the viscosity of the high pressure gas is to much for the chest muscles, the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide may be impaired.
Dec 8, 2018 at 1:10 history answered Loren Pechtel CC BY-SA 4.0