Timeline for There are only a few suppliers of optical terminals: what is the reason?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2021 at 9:23 | history | edited | Fred | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor grammatical changes
|
| Nov 4, 2021 at 8:23 | history | edited | Anna Koroleva | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 456 characters in body
|
| Nov 3, 2021 at 11:04 | history | edited | Anna Koroleva | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 118 characters in body
|
| Nov 3, 2021 at 9:39 | comment | added | Ng Ph | If in your question, you link to a paper saying you have read it, then expect people to read it and ask you why is it relevant to your question? It would be a waste of everbody's time to link to a paper, then say I am not interested in this aspect. Don't take this as a cross-examination, but as a recommendation to make your question more answerable. A good question contains 80% of the answer. | |
| Nov 3, 2021 at 9:24 | comment | added | Anna Koroleva | @NgPh I am not intereted with atmospheric aspects. I am lokking for other aspects/ reason | |
| Nov 3, 2021 at 9:23 | history | edited | Anna Koroleva | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| S Nov 3, 2021 at 9:22 | history | suggested | Amazon Dies In Darkness | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
emphasize that ONLY a few suppliers currently exist
|
| Nov 3, 2021 at 9:21 | comment | added | Ng Ph | I think you should ask that question (is sunlight considered as atmospheric aspects) first. Also, try to be focussed: either you are interested in technical details, or you are more interested in a list of manufacturers. The two require different expertise/knowledge. | |
| Nov 3, 2021 at 8:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 3, 2021 at 9:22 | |||||
| Nov 3, 2021 at 7:25 | history | edited | Anna Koroleva | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 50 characters in body
|
| Nov 3, 2021 at 6:55 | comment | added | Anna Koroleva | @NgPh The linked reseach proposed a filter to protect lasercom terminal telescopes against solar or earth albedo. Sun light is atmospheric aspect, isnt? | |
| Nov 2, 2021 at 21:50 | history | edited | Fred | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammatical changes
|
| Nov 2, 2021 at 20:17 | answer | added | Polar_Bear | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 2, 2021 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1455595587513028608 | ||
| Nov 2, 2021 at 17:54 | comment | added | Ng Ph | BTW, is your question related to scientific research or market research. This is because you inform that you do not have an engineering background, yet you cite an engineering article to explain your comprehension problem. Your final question seems to be rather technical too (?) | |
| Nov 2, 2021 at 17:50 | comment | added | Ng Ph | The article you linked to, as an example of what you have read on atmospheric aspects, has nothing to do with atmospheric aspects. If you are not familiar with atmospheric effects on optical communications in general (not necessarliy laser communication), you can try to add questions on these effects. If you are familiar with these effects, you are encouraged to link to the proper papers. | |
| Nov 2, 2021 at 17:41 | comment | added | Jon Custer | The main challenge is probably having a reasonable market to produce a product for... | |
| Nov 2, 2021 at 14:00 | history | asked | Anna Koroleva | CC BY-SA 4.0 |