Timeline for Differences between numerical propagators
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2021 at 18:07 | vote | accept | Frank | ||
| Nov 26, 2021 at 18:08 | |||||
| Nov 25, 2021 at 23:42 | comment | added | Frank | Thanks for your answer! You're right, in fact I've already noted that changing the step size doesn't affect the solution or the deviations with GMAT. The same happens with different integrators. The problem Is that I've already validated the function which computes the derivative of the state vector, because the results are the same of GMATS. Therefore, if the integrator works well and also does the function which computes the accelerations due to the perturbations.. what causes this problem? Also, with a lower altitude and inclination, the error seems lower even If non neglectible. | |
| Nov 25, 2021 at 16:49 | history | answered | leftaroundabout | CC BY-SA 4.0 |