Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 13, 2022 at 23:55 comment added linkhyrule5 Planets are big. Nothing in the Solar System is going to meaningfully change for thousands to millions of years. There's no "risk" involved here; if you design the satellite so that it doesn't go through an eclipse, then the highest-likelihood scenario it somehow does anyway involves us miraculously inventing planet-moving engines in twenty years. Meanwhile, the other side involves a heavier payload, more moving parts, and more stuff in orbit.
Dec 26, 2021 at 14:52 comment added Freddo411 I'd counter that it's risky to design a spacecraft that can't handle being in eclipse more than a tiny amount of time -- vs. scaling the batteries up a bit handle short term periods in eclipse. It's an engineering tradeoff
Dec 4, 2021 at 8:41 comment added David Hammen While the spacecraft bus is on the hot side, the avionics equipment and battery are shielded to some extent from that extreme 85 °C environment. The spacecraft bus operates at about 300 K (about 30 °C).
Dec 3, 2021 at 22:50 history edited uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0
added 96 characters in body
Dec 3, 2021 at 22:30 history edited uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0
added 8 characters in body
Dec 3, 2021 at 22:03 history answered uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0