Timeline for Could the Rocketdyne F-1 have been reused?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2023 at 7:57 | comment | added | jwenting | Worse, the added mass of the recovery related systems would have meant smaller payload and/or lower orbital altitude, thus changing the mission profile to where probably a single launch solution to the moon would not have been possible. Which is why some F9 and FH missions don't recover, and have the recovery hardware removed. | |
| May 10, 2023 at 23:56 | comment | added | Mark | @RussellBorogove, it would be more interesting to know if the actual formulation of RP-1 has changed. RP-1 doesn't call for a specific combination of ingredients; rather, it places limits on what's allowed to be present. | |
| May 10, 2023 at 18:58 | comment | added | Erin Anne | I don't disbelieve most of this answer, but it'd be better with references | |
| May 10, 2023 at 17:52 | comment | added | Russell Borogove | Has the specification of RP-1 changed since 1967? | |
| May 10, 2023 at 13:47 | history | answered | caInstrument | CC BY-SA 4.0 |