Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 7 at 17:24 comment added Galerita @Cornelis I guess we wont know about fluorite abundance on Mars until we do geological surveys. That means geological surveys and drilling on the surface. I'm reasonably confident enough is there. Known Earth reserves of minerals always magically increase when existing mines run out. So even on Earth there's a lot more acidspar out there. And lower grades are still usable with a bit more effort. The issue is making the GHGs in-situ.
Apr 7 at 17:15 comment added Galerita Thanks Cornelis. I'll re-read it. Here's another paper I just found, "Fluorine in the bulk composition of Mars has been estimated at 32 ppm vs 19.4 ppm for the Earth". pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.051511598 Still more on Mars. I remain convinced the problem is manufacturing fluorocarbons & SF6, not finding fluorite. I can't find research on this. As you know, I've partially explored it here space.stackexchange.com/a/65779/54582 & here chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/181813/…
Apr 7 at 15:50 comment added Cornelis Another extensive answer, thank you ! I must say, I have my doubts about your presumed relative high surface concentrations of fluorite on Mars. Please read the first alinea of the Discussion paragraph of the linked research letter. I got the idea that the conglomerates wherein the F bearing minerals were found, represent a quite unique environment likely related to magmatism around the crater rim of Gale.
Apr 7 at 7:01 history edited Galerita CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Apr 7 at 6:56 history edited Galerita CC BY-SA 4.0
added 492 characters in body
Apr 7 at 6:41 history edited Galerita CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Apr 7 at 6:35 history edited Galerita CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Apr 7 at 6:30 history edited Galerita CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Apr 7 at 6:24 history edited Galerita CC BY-SA 4.0
added 16 characters in body
Apr 7 at 6:18 history answered Galerita CC BY-SA 4.0