In most references the specific impulse is the effective exhaust velocity (actual exhaust velocity plus corrections due to pressure difference between exhaust and surrounding atmosphere) divided by a standard gravity, which also incidentally gives $I_\mathrm{sp}$ units of seconds. The rocket equation is then
$$\mathrm{d}v=I_\mathrm{sp}g\ln\left(\frac{m_i}{m_f}\right)=v_e\ln\left(\frac{m_i}{m_f}\right)$$
which makes sense. The thing is I see this exact formulation used a lot when talking about photon rockets or engines with relativistic propellant; it would make sense to me to multiply by the Lorentz factor given by the particular velocity $\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_e^2}{c^2}}}$, since the ejected propellant will be observed by those aboard the rocket to have a mass (and thus momentum) scaled upwards by that factor. I never see this in any text though.
This omission would also put an upper limit on specific impulse (and thus on thrust-efficient delta-v, i.e. not spending millions of years to accelerate, and thus on effective space exploration) because without relativistic corrections $v_e$ caps out at $c=299792458$ which is in the grand scheme of the tyranny of the rocket equation not a huge number. Am I wrong for relativistically correcting the rocket equation at least in this sense?
(This is just focusing on relativistic corrections due to the speed of the ejected propellant, not from the ship's speed. I know that there are more complex rocket equations to account for that.)