10
$\begingroup$

Rotating a spacecraft to create a simulated 1 g should cure most medical problems with microgravity. But can one play ball? A rotating spacecraft with several 10s or 100 meter to the center of rotation, seems to cause funny effects for items thrown "upwards" (inwards to the hub). How big are these effects and would they make for games which for once were interesting to watch? Would the players adapt quickly, or would they remain utterly frustrated? Illustration below from Theodore W. Hall enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I can sense it's a good question. Could be re-written to be more general: how do humans adapt to non-uniform force fields? Considering many astronauts are pilots I do not doubt they can suppress old unworkable reflexes and think before shooting at the basket. Reaction time suffers, though. Just how much does this situation slow reactions? Can we extrapolate from existing experiments? $\endgroup$ – Deer Hunter Jul 25 '15 at 1:15
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You might want to check this out. Not precisely the same thing, but adaptation can happen surprisingly quickly. youtube.com/watch?v=eA2d1tKNFoU $\endgroup$ – userLTK Jul 25 '15 at 2:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @userLTK That's impressive! Japanese backward binocular soccer seems harder to adapt to. $\endgroup$ – LocalFluff Jul 25 '15 at 6:14
  • $\begingroup$ @Deer Hunter Testing human how humans adapt to non-uniform force fields is actually possible without requiring space flights. Imagine a big, rotating parabola. This would have different strengths of gravity, in addition to weird behaviour due to Coriolis force. Not the same as basketball in rotating space hab though. $\endgroup$ – Hohmannfan Dec 13 '15 at 9:49
2
$\begingroup$

How quickly human adapts to other kinds of force fields is hard to answer, because no one has ever lived in one. For weightlessness however, we have a lot of data showing that humans quickly learn how to move around and predicting movement of objects.

Let us consider some of the interesting effects in a rotating cylinder. For a hab with a radius of 10 meters and simulated Earth gravity, walking against the direction of rotation at 1.5 m/s will make you feel about 28% lighter. In the opposite direction you will feel 32% heavier. Throwing a ball towards the direction of rotation will cause it to fall down as expected, but the harder you throw it, the faster it falls. In the other direction we have a lot of confusing behaviour. If you throw the ball gently, it would just arc and fall like normal. Throwing it harder causes the ball to fall slower, up to a point where it is not falling at all, orbiting inside the hab. After six and a half second the ball returns to you, making it possible to catch your own throw. An orbiting ball will be slowed by the air eventually falling to the floor.
Throwing the ball even harder would cause it to at first fall, then falling slower when air has slowed it down a bit, after that it would start to orbit, and finally it will fall and hit the ground.

Throwing the ball straight up would make it rise at first, then its trajectory will be bended to the side and fall down. No matter how hard you throw it, it would always miss the centre. If you instead throw it at an angle sidewards it follows the type of trajectory showed in your diagram. This makes it possible for the ball to pass the middle using a loop, or even a spiral path.

This effects are adding a great deal of unpredictability to a ball game, especially if the ball ends up slowly floating in the middle, and then returns after an unpredictable time depending on how close it was to the middle.

A somewhat related non-uniform force field environment is a rotating parabola constructed on Earth. Here it will always feel like you are on a flat floor too, with similar weird effects like your weight increasing towards the edge, and ball trajectories apparently bending to the side.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Since the direction matters, you'd want the court oriented sideways to the rotation, so neither team had a big advantage. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Dec 16 '15 at 20:48
  • $\begingroup$ Someone needs to turn this into an AR or VR game asap! $\endgroup$ – uhoh May 6 '17 at 1:09
  • $\begingroup$ They learn pretty quickly and quite instinctually... to a degree that return requires re-learning gravity... $\endgroup$ – SF. May 6 '17 at 1:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.