The term suicide burn occasionally comes up in answers and comments, usually without any real explanation or definition.
What is meant by the term "suicide burn"?
Space Exploration Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for spacecraft operators, scientists, engineers, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
For a powered descent to the surface of a massive body like the Moon, it turns out to be most fuel efficient to do all your deceleration at the very end of the trajectory, right before impact.
(This is because if you decelerate sooner than that, you will be in flight longer; the longer you're up, the more fuel you need to spend counteracting gravity accelerating you toward the surface.)
So the fuel-optimum landing involves falling faster and faster toward the surface before doing your deceleration burn, which looks suicidal (and will be, if you don't leave sufficient margin for error).
Hence: suicide burn.
SpaceX's first-stage recovery is another example. In that case, suicide burn is a requirement, because even at minimum stable throttle, the engine produces more thrust than the weight of the stage, so it can't hold a constant low downward speed for any length of time; it has to time the burn so that it hits altitude zero just before it reaches velocity zero. SpaceX calls this maneuver "hover-slam".
I'm not sure of the origins of the term "suicide burn"; it's extremely popular in the Kerbal Space Program community. It doesn't appear in the Google books nGram viewer at all. It comes up in some SpaceX discussions but a lot of that looks like bleed from KSP.