2
$\begingroup$

In space vehicle control and fault recovery, how it works is that a big brother copy is on the ground and being fed with most recent data from spacecraft, the little brother. This ground one is an exact model plus extensive instrumentation that cannot be put into the spacecraft. Thus, the spacecraft does not need to run diagnostics and always sends them back to the big brother. Sending the most recent data has actually the minimum communication overhead because it's needed anyways.

I want to know how they make the communication low-overhead, and how such protocols work. Is there any high-level documentation or scientific paper for that?

UPDATE: Right- we know the data rate is so low, and so the probe should make the best use of this low bandwidth. Now, my question is "how" do they maximum gain out of this low bitrate? What is their transmission protocol, their naming, etc? (at application level)

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you please clarify which missions use such protocols that you describe? I don't see how having a replica in the lab is supposed to remove the need to perform self-diagnostics on the flight hardware, they wouldn't be subjects to the same environment and they're not quantum entangled either. Did you mean to ask how flight hardware telemetry data is downloaded to the replica for debugging and testing of fixes before uploading them to the flight hardware? I don't understand your position on low overhead either, by your logic, there's then none. There's always transmission backlogs to clear. $\endgroup$
    – TildalWave
    Aug 12, 2015 at 23:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Did you have something like this in mind? $\endgroup$
    – TildalWave
    Aug 12, 2015 at 23:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This question also contains a lot of detail on communications protocols: space.stackexchange.com/questions/7776/… $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    Aug 14, 2015 at 10:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Hobbes Thanks for the link. Right, the data rate is so low, and so the probe should make the best use of this low bandwidth. Now, my question is "how" do they maximum gain out of this low bitrate? What is their transmission protocol, their naming, etc? (at application level) $\endgroup$
    – Tina J
    Aug 14, 2015 at 21:25
  • $\begingroup$ The first paragraph of your question still puzzles me. Are you saying that the spacecraft does not send all of its diagnostic data to Earth to minimize the amount of communications time spent on 'housekeeping' vs. sending scientific data? I can sort of see your point: when the diagnostics find no problems, all you need to send is an "everything's okay" message, instead of detailed diagnostic results. $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    Aug 16, 2015 at 10:53

2 Answers 2

3
+200
$\begingroup$

Protocols for space communication are specified by the CCSDS: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Founded in 1982, they "discuss and develop standards for space data and information systems".

In brief they provide protocols for six areas:

  • Space Internetworking Services
  • Mission Ops And Information Management Services
  • Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services
  • System Engineering
  • Cross Support Services
  • Space Link Services

Your question cannot be answered in brief because getting into all of this will cover page after page here. I will simply say that probably everything you need to know can be found on their website, right here.

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

Efficiency in communications affects all aspects of the communication system design.
It's useful to look at this in terms of a model like the OSI model. Now that's aimed at computer networks, but the general principle is similar:

  • at the lowest level, you have the hardware: transmitter, receiver, antennas. Anything you do here influences the total system throughput: a bigger antenna or more powerful transmitter = more data can be sent.
  • at higher levels, you have communications protocols like the turbo coding used by New Horizons. This makes sure you can send your message in as few bits as possible.
  • the top level is the application: the actual science data and diagnostics/housekeeping information you're interested in.

At the application level, a lot of research as been done into data compression. Typically, you want to send all data from the instruments to Earth (no compression), or you want to send enough that the original data can be reconstructed (lossless compression).

In recent missions, we've seen lossy compression being used: the spacecraft decides which parts of its data are irrelevant and can be thrown away. New Horizons has done this in two ways:

  • by cropping images. For instance, this image of a region of Charon is a rectangular cropped region. The remainder of the image (which would have shown empty space so it wasn't very interesting) was not sent at all. Charon
  • by compressing the image data using a lossy algorithm (JPEG, in this case). JPEG throws away data based on what the human eye can see: tiny differences are rounded off because they'd all look the same anyway. There is a risk in this: by throwing away data you reduce the scientific usefulness of the image. So New Horizons sends us compressed images now so we have at least something to look at, and will send the full, uncompressed data set over the next year and a half.

Data compression will become more common. Some of the new space telescopes generate way more data than they can ever send to Earth, so the spacecraft has to contain powerful algorithms that help decide which images are interesting enough to send to Earth.

Note: this answer focuses mostly on the science data as that will be bulk of the data volume. I haven't found good information on how housekeeping data is handled.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.