7
$\begingroup$

This is part of a short story posted on worldbuilding.se, but setting my story aside, it was recommended that the part about precision be asked here.

With what precision can an object be put on the moon, with today's technology?

This is specifically related to the accuracy of the de-orbit, and the assumption is that there is a will to impact the moon with an object with precision (I'm trying not to stray into worldbuilding territory right now).

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What's your dV budget for the lander? $\endgroup$ Oct 11, 2015 at 18:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The de-orbit maneuver will not be the only maneuver in the sequence, so anything really goes, esp. if you have close-up photos for visual navigation. $\endgroup$ Oct 11, 2015 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ @DeerHunter for the purpose of the question, it would be a place that we have landed on before. I don't know if that means we have precise imagery or not, but maybe that helps to answer? $\endgroup$
    – Mikey
    Oct 12, 2015 at 1:43

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

Really precise. Apollo 12 landed only 600 feet off of target. That's the only landing with precision that I can find, but presumably we could do it at least as well today.

The moon is easier to land precisely on than, say, Mars or Earth, because of the lack of atmosphere. The fact that it is so close to Earth also allows for a spacecraft to be precisely on the correct trajectory, with Mars there is always a small amount of uncertainty, which can really add up.

As for how accurate with a hard landing, the best analog was LCROSS, which intentionally targeted a point on the Moon. The miss distance was 146 m for the primary stage, 766m for the less precise part.

I imagine if you wanted to, you could probably improve that by an order of magnitude, although I have nothing with which to base that claim. This could be accomplished by using GPS, visual maps, and precise knowledge of it's gravitational field, among others.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We have better models of Lunar gravity field. We have experiments on GPS use beyond LEO (and can field auxiliary subsats around the Moon if need be). We have visual navigation software and much better on-board computing power. These are the key enablers, IMHO. $\endgroup$ Oct 12, 2015 at 7:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.