2
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to design a rocket, such that if anything goes wrong, the crew and people on the ground will always be in no harm, or are there certain limitations that we will never be able to overcome?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by Vedant Chandra, kim holder, Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩, Nathan Tuggy, Gwen Nov 6 '15 at 20:04

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 16
    $\begingroup$ I'd say it's impossible to design a completely fail-safe bread knife, so no. $\endgroup$ – Nathan Tuggy Nov 6 '15 at 7:14
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It is possible to design the rocket in such a way that both the crew and the failsafe mechanisms will be protected from harm due to failure of other mechanisms. But if the failsafe mechanisms fail on their own (not as result of, say, explosion shock but because e.g. some part was made from faulty material) they can still fail. $\endgroup$ – SF. Nov 6 '15 at 8:56
  • $\begingroup$ As for people on the ground - the launch phase can be secured quite well (with self-destruct sequences that prevent runaway boosters wreaking havoc, e.g. blowing up the nozzles on SRBs that by themselves can fly really far) but if the rocket fails 30m/s away from the orbit, it's anyone's guess where it will impact. And again, failsafes can fail too. $\endgroup$ – SF. Nov 6 '15 at 9:04
  • $\begingroup$ You might like to consider what you mean by "fail-safe". Do you mean "as reliable as [some threshold, e.g. commercial passenger aviation]" or "such that if it fails, it does so in a safe manner". If the latter, then think which bit is failing (e.g. delivery in orbit) and which bit is kept safe (e.g. the un-involved public, passengers etc). $\endgroup$ – Puffin Nov 8 '15 at 18:13
4
$\begingroup$

No, there will always be failure modes that may lead to injury or death with any design (see Nathan Tuggy's comment!). Launch and space travel involve conditions that you have to actively control to avoid catastrophe. For example, once the rocket has launched it is also now a wayward missile if guidance and control systems were to fail -- hence why there are explosives installed to self-destruct, as well as why launches occur over the ocean or other uninhabited areas (mostly).

The most important thing that your question alludes to is the idea that failures are bound to happen so the system should fail gracefully. Unfortunately, we learn the most about how to best handle failures by studying catastrophes that have happened. A tragic example is the loss of the Apollo 1 crew, where an in-ward opening hatch was used because it was feared it might accidentally open in the vacuum of space but in the end made it too difficult to escape during an emergency (of course this was by no means the cause or the sole contributing factor).

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

At most, I could see rocket travel being something akin to commercial airline travel is today. Commercial airline travel, while safe, is hindered by poor pilot judgement, mechanical defects, etc. And don't even start about the terrorist potential! Still, for the most part, it is quite safe, and in fact, I personally don't think anything of the safety factor of flying.

Today, it isn't possible to build rockets as reliable as commercial airliners. Why? First of all, the technology is still in it's infancy. There have only been around 5,000 orbital launches in all history (See Wikipedia count of rocket launches). Compare that to the 30,000 flights in the United States every day! The reliability has to be up to allow for such a convenience.

launches per year Furthermore, it should be noted that rockets are controlled explosions. Yes, in theory you can say that of a jet or car engine, but they are on a much smaller scale (And don't contain oxidizer). With the oxidizer and fuel, there is much more potential for catastrophic damage. Furthermore, there are huge heat loads makes things even more difficult.

Bottom line, space travel can no doubt be made more reliable, but achieving a fail safe rocket isn't likely to be done anytime soon. One could hope for the reliability of commercial aircraft, which hopefully will happen someday soon.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.