The space shuttle used three SSME, organized in a triangle with two next to each other closest to the external tank, and one on top of those. I am pretty sure the first two engines were close to identical, in order to maintain symmetry. But the third engine did not have to be, as it was offset in the unsymmetrical direction of the orbiter. Because it was a little bit more distant from the centre of mass than the two others, i would expect it to have more of a control function, having a larger gimbal range and throttability. Was that the case? And were there other differences, like in the propellant feed system or in nozzle shape?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In the launches I've seen on TV, engine throttle settings were always given as a single number, indicating that all 3 engines were at the same setting. $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 12:18
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Yes, given no failures, throttle settings were always the same on all 3. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 12:34

2 Answers 2


The engines themselves were identical within manufacturing tolerances, but there were some installation differences, mostly due to "packaging" constraints in the crowded aft compartment of the shuttle.

The propellant feedlines were not identical in shape and this resulted in some minor performance differences. For example, the left SSME LH2 line had a slightly larger pressure drop and thus the left SSME would be the first to fail in a low Net Positive Suction Pressure (NPSP) malfunction case.

enter image description here (picture from Rocketdyne "Space Shuttle Main Engine Pocket Data RI/RD87-142")

Another difference on the left engine is that its thrust vector control actuators were mounted in a different orientation from that of the other two, which drove some software changes, but was operationally transparent.

enter image description here

TVC source

Since the TVC attach points on the engines themselves were identical, this different arrangement of the actuators for the left engine meant that it was actually installed in a different rotational attitude from the other two. In this personal photo of the Main Propulsion Test Article (a functionally identical shuttle aft compartment used for testing) taken at Marshall Space Flight Center one can see how the mounting interfaces are rotated 90 degrees for the left engine.

enter image description here

And a schematic (this is, maybe confusingly, looking aft, so the left engine is on the right of this picture).

enter image description here

(picture from Rocketdyne "Space Shuttle Main Engine Pocket Data RI/RD87-142")


The 3 engines were identical. Of the 46 SSME engines produced, at least 3 were installed in 3 different positions on various flights:

  • engine 2012 on OV-103 Discovery
  • engine 2019 on OV-104 Atlantis
  • engine 2054 on OV-105 Endeavour

If you really want to know which engine flew where, there's a chart that tracks the flight history of each engine. Engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney made press kits for each flight that detailed which engine was installed in which position.

A better list than these two is included in the Space Shuttle Almanac, page 1031-1034 (not available for free though). This lists the position of each engine per flight.

Fun fact: As the SSME was developed during the Shuttle program, there were various flights with 2 "production" engines and one upgraded engine.

This photo of an SSME being installed shows what's part of the SSME (i.e. which is identical on all 3 engines).

SSME installation. Engine bell, turbopump and lots of plumbing are installed as a unit

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So, they were identical, but was there any difference in the propellant feed system? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 10:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.