We know that the SLS is going to use solid rocket boosters that are decedents of the boosters used on the Space Shuttle. The new version is supposed to be bigger and better, but will NASA be able to recover them to cut down on cost?

Does NASA have any plans to adopt the active recovery systems that SpaceX are working on?

  • $\begingroup$ See How will the SRBs used by the SLS differ from those used by the Shuttle? $\endgroup$ – TildalWave Feb 9 '16 at 18:23
  • $\begingroup$ I see the reference to the SRB not having a parachute for recovery, ...but we now live in the era where an ocean splashdown is the only option to recover a rocket. $\endgroup$ – Rickest Rick Feb 9 '16 at 18:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Remember, the refurbishment costs of the Shuttle's boosters was almost as high as replacing them would have been. $\endgroup$ – Loren Pechtel Feb 9 '16 at 19:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RickestRick I think you may have omitted a "not" from that comment. Although I think there must be a species of gremlin that specifically adds and removes negations in random places online. $\endgroup$ – Darren Mar 22 '18 at 16:35

It can but it won't.

It was decided that the costs of recovery, inspection and refurbishing the boosters plus increased risk of disaster due to unnoticed wear is just not worth it - the boosters will not be recovered for economical, not technical reasons.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are there any NASA released documents that confirm this? $\endgroup$ – Rickest Rick Feb 9 '16 at 18:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RickestRick: nasaspaceflight.com/2012/02/… or ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20120014501.pdf $\endgroup$ – SF. Feb 9 '16 at 19:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Confirmed, I'm sad to say. NASA doc says there is no recovery system for the boosters. $\endgroup$ – Rickest Rick Feb 9 '16 at 19:19
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Too low of a flight rate. It was always marginal even for shuttle. $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble Feb 9 '16 at 19:29
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @OrganicMarble: Ah, yes. The SRBs of the shuttle suffered less salt-related damage in the direct bath in the ocean than by waiting for refurbishing for the next launch in the salty seaside atmosphere for the next couple months. That would be even worse with more sparse launches. $\endgroup$ – SF. Feb 10 '16 at 6:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.