7
$\begingroup$

Related question...

Why don't astronauts do isometrics or timed static contractions against immovable objects (like fixed bars at different heights) to sustain muscle mass and bone density in zero, micro, or low (to Earth) gravity conditions?

This seems like a cheep and effective way to mitigate a lot of the problems.

Or, does anyone know if the do?

This seems like a very simple solution.

enter image description here or this:

enter image description here

and won't take up much space in space.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ @TildalWave - Seems like one could use a pair of simple strain or force gauges to measure load and a built in timer (or a stop watch) to measure time under load. You'd have everything one would need to implement a program of progressive resistance training. Following that one can measure the percent of body fat. Not perfect, but simple and likely very effective. $\endgroup$
    – Jagra
    Commented Mar 6, 2016 at 15:01
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ At least in tests on rats isometric resistance exercise failed to counteract atrophy. $\endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    Commented Apr 4, 2016 at 17:00

4 Answers 4

4
$\begingroup$

Check out this video in which Astronaut Suni Williams gives a tour of the ISS. Among the items she shows is the TVIS, as already mentioned, but at about 16:30, she shows a different exercise device which appears to be exactly the answer to your question.

By the way, she explains that the vibration hazard from the TVIS would be to the solar panels (but it would certainly be disruptive to microgravity experiments). One could well imagine that a harmonic resonance from someone cranking away on the bike could easily overwhelm the structures which hold the solar panels together and attach them to the station.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS) (formerly called visual impairment and intracranial pressure syndrome) is a group of findings and symptoms that have been found in astronauts who have undergone long duration space flight missions in microgravity environments. There is no single agreed upon cause, but one risk factor is intensive resistive exercise https://eyewiki.aao.org/Spaceflight-Associated_Neuro-Ocular_Syndrome_(SANS)

Isometric exercise would be considered intensive resistive exercise. Until there is a better understanding of SANS and effective prevention, it would be wise to avoid isometrics for prolonged microgravity missions.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

It seems like simple equipment to support isometric exercises would indeed be logical. There might be such a thing. But I couldn't find a quick answer for this. I almost expect to see multiple experimental solutions, given that combating muscle atrophy in zero G is a major concern.

Probably the most famous piece of exercise of equipment on the ISS is the Treadmill with Vibration Isolation Stabilization (TVIS). As indicated by the name, the treadmill's chief asset is its ability to be used without propagating virbration to the vast number of micro-gravity experiments on the station. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treadmill_with_Vibration_Isolation_Stabilization

This isolation turns out to be a major design requirement. Equipment put on the station should not induce measurable vibration to the station. In fact, this is a major reason why there is no human-sized centrifuge or rotating section connected to the station, even though this would go far toward understanding any proposed partial gravity prescriptions and probably combat atrophy. (There are vibration problems on the station as is. NASA and its partners probably don't want to compound the problem.)

As for why the TVIS is so famous... For very strange reasons related to the magical hold of Stephen Colbert on parts of humanity, it is also known as the Combined Operational Load Bearing External Resistance Treadmill (COLBERT). It was a little weird while it was happening, but it's a good story, and not just because of Colbert. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tranquility_(ISS_module)#Naming_contest

Were it not for the naming controversy, many of us probably wouldn't even be aware of that particular treadmill.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This presents some interesting information but none of it answers the question. $\endgroup$
    – kim holder
    Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ This treadmill reminds me of all the money NASA spent to develop the famous zero-gravity "space pen" during the early days of the manned program. They could write upside down! The Soviets used pencils. $\endgroup$
    – Jagra
    Commented Mar 6, 2016 at 14:53
  • $\begingroup$ Additional thoughts, unless one can crank up the load in a progressive way over time on the treadmill, it doesn't seem like it would do much building or maintaining of either muscle mass or bone density. $\endgroup$
    – Jagra
    Commented Mar 6, 2016 at 15:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ To elaborate on my answer a bit, the question asked about doing isometric exercises against immovable objects. In essence, the immovable object cannot be the ISS structure itself because of vibration concerns. It would have to be something that isolates the ISS from the vibration, such as TVIS. $\endgroup$
    – Rick 0xfff
    Commented Mar 6, 2016 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ @Jagra: Regarding space pens, see history.nasa.gov/spacepen.html $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 14, 2021 at 18:33
-2
$\begingroup$

We have many muscles, and not all are easy to train (respiratory, heart, and many inner muscles). It take also much place and time to build and operate a gymn, both of which are taken from experiments (so not so cheap), and there is also no "fix": the actual space training machines are designed so that they don't give regular impulse to the ISS structure.

But astronauts do a lot of exercises to mitigate the problem.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.