6
$\begingroup$

How effective can gravity assists from the Moon be at getting a vehicle from near earth to Mars?

For this question, let's assume that a transit time of up to ten years is acceptable.

Say we've put together a vehicle at Earth-Moon L1. Could we get to Mars with minimal delta-V by entering an elliptical orbit retrograde vs. the moon, performing a gravity assist resulting in a larger ellipse which returns near the moon also in retrograde, performing another gravity assist, and repeat until sufficient velocity is established to reach Earth escape?

Then, if we don't have enough to reach a Mars orbit, could a gravity assist with Earth, Mars, or Venus get the vehicle out to Mars where aerobraking could be used to capture the vehicle?

How much savings is possible this way compared to a simple Hohmann transfer?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ To get from LEO to a near moon apogee takes about 3.1 km/s. To achieve Trans Mars Injection from LEO takes about 3.6 km/s. So you'd save .5 km/s, max. If that. $\endgroup$
    – HopDavid
    Apr 12, 2016 at 1:55
  • $\begingroup$ And add a lot of time, which is not good for manned Mars missions. $\endgroup$ Apr 12, 2016 at 12:43

1 Answer 1

11
$\begingroup$

It does not offer that much of a saving, as the $\Delta v$ needed for a Moon transfer is 3120 m/s, which is not a lot less than a Mars transfer at 3600 m/s. Timing the Moon to be in the right place may even give you a slightly less optimal launch window for the Mars transfer.

However, such manoeuvres are entirely possible. A single Moon flyby can save you a little over 100 m/s. But, you also have the possibility of a tipple Moon flyby:

1) Spend the first 3120 m/s of $\Delta v$ in LEO, to get a minimal Moon transfer orbit. Doing a flyby will not get you up to escape velocity, as the Moon can not bend the orbit 180 degrees (relative to the Moon). The new orbit can be targeted to have an orbital period of exactly 1 month.

2) After one month spent in the new orbit, the spacecraft encounters the Moon at the same location, and completes the first manoeuvre. The target velocity is just at Earth's escape velocity.

3) At the border of the Earth's Hill sphere, perform a very small burn (some 10-20 m/s). Fall back towards the Earth, and do a little extra burn at periapsis. On the outbound leg, the last Moon flyby is performed, and the spacecraft does now have enough velocity to achieve a Mars transfer orbit.

All in all, saving approximately 300 m/s of those 480 m/s gives you a lot more trouble than it is worth, adding more things that can go wrong with the mission, and adding several extra months to the trip time.

Out of pure theoretical obscurity, you can actually skip the periapsis burn at stage 3) of the tripple Moon flyby. The spacecraft does then still have a little $v_{inf}$ after escaping the system, but not enough for a Mars transfer. An "Earth flyby" is not possible in this context, as what we are trying to achieve is a higher Earth $v_{inf}$. However, we can take advantage of Earth not being just a planet, but a system including the Moon. Entering a two-body system, you can actually gain some $v_{inf}$:

enter image description here

The synodic period to synch up with the Earth-Moon system is of course several years long, and one such flyby is not enough to gain the remaining velocity for a Mars transfer. So after a few decades, you have eventually gained all of the 480 m/s for "free". (Easily lost in station keeping during the extremely long and precision demanding mission.)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.