5
$\begingroup$

What fraction of launch payload mass for a manned (or animal'd) mission is attributable to life support equipment?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The fraction of launch payload of a ECLSS (environmental control and life support system) depends on a number of factors. The two most important factors to consider are:

  1. What type of systems make up the ECLSS? Are your systems completely regenerative or do they require consumables? Most likely the system is a combination of the two. A fully regenerative system wouldn't require extra consumables and thus would result in a lower overall subsystem mass.
  2. What is the mission profile and how does this influence the safety margin of the ECLS system? All human spaceflight missions are designed within a certain safety margin and thus require redundant systems, extra margins with regard to the consumables, and spare parts to fix the systems if/when they break. This is all to say that a mission to LEO which has the ability for a quick abort might allow for a lower safety margin. Such a mission could quickly abort if the ECLSS fails irreparably using an escape vehicle (i.e. Soyuz on the ISS). A mission to Mars does not have the ability for a quick abort and thus the safety margin and the ECLSS mass must increase.

Larsen and Pranke's text Human Spaceflight gives a rule of thumb of 8% dry mass for the ECLSS. This includes pressurizing, oxygen supply, controlling and revitalizing the atmosphere, and active thermal control. This was found via extrapolation from NASA mission data.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The duration of the misson and the number of humans or animals also influence the necessary fraction of payload. $\endgroup$ – Uwe Sep 20 '16 at 10:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.