This answer discusses the three methods that the Falcon 9 1st stage uses for attitude control during re-entry and landing. They are: cold nitrogen jets, "hypersonic" grid fins, and thrust vectoring of the engines.

It is pointed out there that the grid fins are moving even in the last seconds of landing. I suggested that like the front arms of the Tyrannosaurus Rex - they may move when it moves, but that doesn't mean that they are necessarily doing anything useful.

The following questions and their answers are relevant:

What is the function of the hypersonic grid fins on SpaceX's booster?

How long does the F9 first stage remain hypersonic under control of its grid fins?

Did CRS-6 landing fail because the steering fins are ineffective at low speed?

In this Tweet and image, Elon Musk calls them "hypersonic grid fins".

enter image description here

My question is How effective are Falcon 9 1st stage grid fins in the last few seconds before landing?

I'm looking for something quantitative, and with some kind of supporting information, rather than opinions. Thanks!

The speeds are at most a few hundred kph and of course down to zero. My feeling is that since they are actually pretty small and mostly holes, at these speeds they are not significantly effective, but they keep moving anyway because it is simply safer to not have anything in the control code that turns them off, thereby reducing one possible failure mode.

I also believe that in the last few seconds before landing, where velocity is low and fast attitude correction time is crucial, only thrust vectoring is useful for attitude control of the Falcon 9 1st stage.

So if they are indeed ineffective at the end, bonus points for an explanation why they keep moving! :)

Here's a video of an early test of the articulation (no cows were harmed). At around 01:20 they rotate, and the rocket begins to roll as well. Is this cause and effect? Is it the correct direction?:

Screen shots from the video:

Falcon 9 Grid Fins

Falcon 9 Grid Fins

T. Rex: (model thereof) and annotation to help illustrate the question. (from Wikipedia)

T. Rex

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ As a rule, Grid Fins are good for sub-sonic and supersonic flight. They a not very good with trans-sonic flight. What they lack in size, they make up in number. They are a bit draggy though, but that is a good thing here. $\endgroup$
    – tl8
    Commented Jun 1, 2016 at 5:27
  • $\begingroup$ @tl8 OK good to know! When trans-sonic, do you know if they cause problems or erratic behavior, or are they just not effective steering at that point? $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jun 1, 2016 at 6:10
  • $\begingroup$ The shock cones prevent effective airflow through the fins. My understanding is that is when peak drag is. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grid_fin $\endgroup$
    – tl8
    Commented Jun 1, 2016 at 8:45
  • $\begingroup$ @tl8 ...discussed in Gagarin's thesis! I never would have thought there was a Wikipedia article on grid fins, thanks. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jun 1, 2016 at 8:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "At around 01:20 they rotate, and the rocket begins to roll as well" Based on the direction they're rotating, it looks to me like they're actually trying to stop the roll. $\endgroup$
    – Ajedi32
    Commented Jun 2, 2016 at 13:53

1 Answer 1


The grid fins are a critical control surface to the returning Falcon 9 first stage, but are only useful during certain parts of the flight after the second-stage has separated.

The grid fins provide virtually none of the control authority to the descending stage in the final seconds of the landing process, once the "landing burn" has started. With the landing burn in operation, the rocket has considerable control authority (directional pointing, as well as descent velocity reduction) from the gimbaling mechanism on the rocket engine(s).

However, the grid fins were the critical control surface during some phases of the earlier part of the reentry. Let me break it down by phases:

  • out-of-the-atmosphere, during the initial minute or so of post-separation flight: the grid fins are useless, as there is insufficient atmospheric mass for them to interact with.
  • atmospheric entry, as the descent continues and the very beginning of the "thicker" atmosphere is encountered. Grid fins are possibly of some benefit, but limited by the still remarkably thin upper atmosphere.
  • encountering the denser atmosphere, this is where the stage surfaces would begin to heat excessively, sufficient to cause damage if unaddressed. SpaceX novel approach is to fire three of the nine first-stage engines to "retropropulsively" reenter the atmosphere. Much control authority is available to the descending stage from the gimbaling rocket engines. The grid fins are unneeded in this phase of the descent.
  • high-altitude, high-velocity supersonic descent Grid fins operate well in the supersonic flight regime, and are very useful here, as well as the only method the rocket has for control authority at this point.
  • transonic flight. This is where the rocket transitions from supersonic to subsonic velocity (simply due to the atmospheric drag that is continually slowing the descending stage), and encounters a great deal of "transonic buffet", where part of the rocket's surfaces are in supersonic flow while other parts are encountering subsonic flow. Grid fins are generally quite ineffective in the transonic regime.
  • subsonic descent. Once the rocket stage is below about Mach 0.9 to Mach 0.8 velocity, the grid fins are once again very useful and the only control surfaces available to help "point" the rocket until the landing burn is initiated. The rocket continues to decelerate initially due to atmospheric drag, up until the time that the force of gravity on the descending stage is equal to the force of drag on the stage; at this point, the stage reaches what is called "terminal velocity." The grid fins are useful during all of this.
  • landing burn firing: grid fin value quickly falls as the velocity rapidly decreases from the several hundred kilometers per hour of terminal velocity to less than a few meters per second. Grid fin effectiveness is a function of velocity of the airstream, so grid fins really do little or nothing in the final few seconds of the descent and landing.
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This looks like it has the makings of a top-notch answer, thanks!! But can you add some kind of link to back up "...virtually none of the control authority...in the final seconds of the landing process, once the 'landing burn' has started." to differentiate it from an opinion? That's my feeling too but I've asked the question because I'm looking for something I can cite. Also, do you mean only "in the final seconds" or all of "once the "landing burn" has started" as well? When you say "Grid fin effectiveness is a function of velocity of the airstream" - what function? Is there a plot of it? $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Aug 24, 2016 at 11:34
  • $\begingroup$ Also, the video in the question shows the grid fins 'appearing' to do something at low velocity, and as mentioned here the text in this article suggest they are affecting the roll. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Aug 24, 2016 at 11:42
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm. My answer is based more on physics, so I don't have a link. But your question is a good one. I think the best answer is: the control authority of four door-sized grid fins once descent velocity is low in those final seconds is simply an order of magnitude or two smaller than the possible x-y (sideways) force on the bottom of the stage available from the gimballed engine(s), whether one or three engines are lit. $\endgroup$
    – Kirk
    Commented Aug 24, 2016 at 12:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ OK that makes sense to me, thus the tyrannosaurus front legs metaphor. If I understand correctly, the features within the grid pattern can be thought of (roughly at least) as airfoils, and as such, should their effect be a (again roughly) linear function of velocity? Maybe you can add a rough estimate of the velocity in the last few seconds vs the velocities where they are really effective? Physics-based answers can use numbers too! $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Aug 24, 2016 at 12:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.