1
$\begingroup$

The page http://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=2 which lists "ISS SATELLITES" includes Tiangong 1. Since it looks to me like all of the other objects are associated with ISS, and Tiangong 1 is a different space station, is this just an oversight?

If this group is related to all space stations, then ISS is a misnomer. If it's really for ISS-related objects, then Tiangong 1 is incorrectly included. Or maybe there is something else I don't understand?

edit: the answer to the last question is "indeed there is." Why does ISS (ZVEZDA) have a different orbital period than SPACE STATION?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'd like to close this out, can someone make an educated guess at least? (see revised title) $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jul 19 '16 at 11:42
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Poisk is part of the ISS too, and shows yet a different period. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisk_(ISS_module) Looks like this is just a bad list. $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble Jul 19 '16 at 21:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The designation continues today. I assume it's a "space station" designation in a world where there's only been one station for a good period of the time that we've had any stations. $\endgroup$ – Saiboogu Mar 30 '18 at 19:14
3
$\begingroup$

Seems to be a mistake based on both common sense and backup from @OrganicMarble's comment above - not to imply that the later is not also a subset of the former :)

Apparently, not everything on the internet is always correct.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.