16
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

For me it looks like water droplets but, I doubt thats the case in space. Also I don't understand why this should be a crafts surface feature. wouldn't one aim to design a spacecraft as smooth as possible? And even if this is intentional designed part of the surface what is this irregular placed rough stuff intended for?

If it is some enviroment condition: What is it and how did it get there?

Edit: Contrast-enhanced detail of the Service Module (Full image: AS17-145-22252) Apparent bubbling on parts of the Service Module's aluminium skin

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @wheeler: Thats true, but remember we are talking here about the apollo mission. And this is as far as I can tell the orbiter, which was part of reentry(?), in which case the surface would have mattered again. But even if this whole part was covered while leaving atmosphere and not part of the manned reentry section, the question remains as it had a reason why designed this inperiodic and rough way. $\endgroup$ – Zaibis Aug 2 '16 at 10:53
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ we're looking at the Service Module which didn't reenter. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Aug 2 '16 at 11:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Note that this might not be the external surface - the SIM bay cover was ejected several days before so Worden could use the cameras, etc. Those bumps might be on the stuff below, which could be insulation of some sort. (I've been looking for detailed pics of the bay pre-flight, just before closing it up but can't find any close enough.) $\endgroup$ – Andy Aug 2 '16 at 12:23
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ It is the external skin, above the SIM bay, as seen in this slightly less blurry photo: spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo17/hires/… $\endgroup$ – Leorex Aug 2 '16 at 13:28
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I've replaced the added image with a better view of the area of interest (AS17-145-22252) $\endgroup$ – Leorex Aug 2 '16 at 19:08
7
$\begingroup$

The Apollo Service module was painted with an aluminum paint. Aluminum paint will bubble severely if exposed to temperatures above 747 K, if properly cured. One can only assume the paint was exposed to something close to that temperature at some point in it's lifecycle.

Tracing back, let's see where we can find them. Here's a picture of the SM from the LM after release around the Moon. It's hard to see, but I think I see some evidence of the bubbling near the CM, where there's high glare. This matches the same spot as seen at your image.

enter image description here

The breakdown of the spacecraft is as follows. Note that the image was almost certainly taken from the side hatch.

enter image description here

If I had to venture a guess, I would say it probably happend when the tower was jettisoned, some small flame reached the paint that caused to to boil somewhat.

The next image is at the Rendezvous, post-Lunar mission. There is certainly bubbling seen there.

enter image description here

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Is there any guess on why exactly that part could have been that close to the temperature, and why expecially the area seems to bea square shaped? $\endgroup$ – Zaibis Aug 3 '16 at 12:39
  • $\begingroup$ I've been searching, but haven't found anything. It seems it was unique to Apollo 17, and if there was a review on it, I can't find it. $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto♦ Aug 3 '16 at 13:16
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Zaibis The square shape is just the shape of the panel. If you look closely you can see some amount of bubbling around the panel as well. It is not perfectly uniform. As to why that panel was exposed more than the rest of the surface, I'm not sure. $\endgroup$ – called2voyage♦ Aug 3 '16 at 14:15
-2
$\begingroup$

Those are bubbles of air, trapped underneath the reflective mylar sheeting that makes up the outermost layer of heat shield for the forward sufaces of the CM. After splashdown, that's the same material that appears ragged, having been shredded by reentry.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Citation or further explanation would be helpful. Were the bubbles there prior to launch? If not, where did the air come from? $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Aug 26 '17 at 1:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The SM does not survive re-entry, and the CM does not show this bubbling in the photos. $\endgroup$ – IconDaemon Feb 26 '18 at 13:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.