I am wondering why it takes two to three years to build this tiny little international docking adapter IDA 3? Every year 4-6 Soyouz spaceships are built.

  • $\begingroup$ I would imagine it's money-limited. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Aug 20 '16 at 16:23

The IDA was never meant for mass production: they needed just 2 for the ISS, and they knew long beforehand when they needed them. So they knew they could spend 2 years building them without impacting the schedule. They built the things by hand, took their time testing them etc. This is labor-intensive, and labor costs money.

To reduce the build time, you have to spend money too: build tools and jigs, design factory processes (e.g. an assembly line), design the IDA for manufacturability, etc. So you have to decide: spend money on labor, or spend money on R&D so you can make the module cheaply? This decision depends on how many modules you need. In this case, only 2. That's an easy decision to make.

Of course, then the launch of IDA 1 went wrong, and the 2-year production time bit them in the ass.

By the way, the fact the Russians can produce 6 Soyuz per year doesn't say anything about how long it takes to build one Soyuz: it could still take 2 years to build one spaceship, if they build 12 of them in parallel to get the production rate they need.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ It is a common saying in programming that nine women can't make a baby in a month - but they can make nine babies in nine months. $\endgroup$ – John Dvorak Aug 20 '16 at 22:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JanDvorak - The first part of that saying is from the Mythical Man-Month by Fred Brooks. Closely related is another saying in programming, also from the Mythical Man-Month: "Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later." Both sayings have applicability that extend far beyond programming. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Aug 21 '16 at 17:44
  • $\begingroup$ Don't they need the same docking adapter on the spacecrafts which dock with the ISS too? Some of which will not be reusable. One IDA seems like have the only phone in the world, don't stay up waiting for a call. $\endgroup$ – LocalFluff Aug 23 '16 at 8:20
  • $\begingroup$ The spacecraft needs a compatible docking ring, yes. But the IDA contains 2 docking rings: an APAS port on one end to connect to the PMAs, and an IDSS port for visiting spacecraft. The APAS port and the module itself (hul, etc.) are unique to the IDA. Only the IDSS port could benefit from series production. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Aug 23 '16 at 9:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.