what's the meaning of Scaled pixel width and scaled pixel height of LROC EDR image obtained by LROC image search tool?
1 Answer
tl;dr Those numbers are meters per pixel. But you have to be careful because they are scans along the spacecraft orbit with the moon rotating underneath, so x and y are skewed.
This answer will get you started. The LRO is an amazing spacecraft with a wide variety of instruments to map the moon's surface by a number of characteristics as well as simultaneous laser ranging information for LRO-Earth and LRO-Moon paths improving lunar gravity models. There is a very helpful one page overview in The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and the New Moon: Mission Highlights and Two More Years of Science From Lunar Orbit! by project scientist John Keller. You are interested in the LROC/NAC (LRO Camera / Narrow-Angle Cameras)
The LRO Cameras are described in detail in Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Instrument Overview (Robinson et al. 2010, Space Sci Rev (2010) 150: 81–124 DOI 10.1007/s11214-010-9634-2):
There are two essentially identical narrow angle cameras, named "L" and "R" in the data arcives. Each camera uses a roughly 5000 pixel by 1 pixel CDD, and the LRO's orbits in the "X" direction continiously scans like a FAX machine or flatbed scanner. The FOV of the cameras slightly overlap in the middle, but extend to the left and right of the centerlin thus the "L" and "R" designations in the image data archives as well.
Much of the data is taken in a roughly polar orbit, including the data in January 2012 you've mentioned, so the ~5000 pixels of a given camera in this case are nearly parallel to lines of lunar latitude.
Upper right latitude 42.08
Upper right longitude 340.64
Lower right latitude 44.76
Lower right longitude 340.7
Lower left latitude 44.76
Lower left longitude 340.33
Upper left latitude 42.09
Upper left longitude 340.28
From that we can plot the approximate border of the image:
The skewing is due to some combination of the inclination orbit rotation of the moon under the spacecraft while it scans. Remember to consider the skewing when trying to use these images!
The width is about $340.7-340.33\approx0.37$ degrees in latitude. The data below show that the camera is looking nearly straight down.
Spacecraft altitude 158.79
Emission angle 1.79
Sub spacecraft latitude 43.42
Sub spacecraft longitude 340.7
The width of the field is roughly 0.37 degrees of longitude, correcting that for the latitude, the width on the surface assuming small angles is:
$$ w \approx r_{moon} \ cos(latitude) \ \frac{\pi \ 0°.37}{180°} \approx 8.150 \ (\text{km}) $$
8150 meters divided by about 5000 pixels gives about 1.63 meters per pixel in y. And what does the data say...
Scaled pixel width 1.59
Scaled pixel height 1.55
So of course the scales in the metadata are going to be more reliable than my approximation, and you should use those numbers because a correct calculation would be much more complex! But my calculations serves as a) a sanity check (did I pass?) and b) an instructive illustration of what's actually going on.
Here is a quicker way to get at the scale, but it doesn't clue you in on the skewing. The table below shows that the LEFT camera has 10.00 microradians per pixel
. Multiply that by the distance from LRO to the imaging location on the moon of 158.79
kilometers and you get...
1.59 meters/pixel! Same as the pixel scaling given.
For fun, you can go to https://lrostk.gsfc.nasa.gov/preview.cgi and see a real-time animation of what LRO is scanning right now!
-
1$\begingroup$ Nice work! +1 for the scale sanity check. $\endgroup$ Nov 6, 2016 at 17:11
-
1$\begingroup$ lrostk.gsfc.nasa.gov/preview.cgi is down :-( . Anyone know of a similar tool? $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2018 at 0:13
-
$\begingroup$ @foobarbecueI don't know, but just fyi some limited current status information is still live here: lroc.sese.asu.edu/about/whereislro $\endgroup$– uhohFeb 25, 2018 at 3:56
-
$\begingroup$ @foobarbecue I've just asked The "live" 3D webpage showing LRO's activity is down, is this temporary? $\endgroup$– uhohFeb 25, 2018 at 5:26
-
1$\begingroup$ I emailed them and got a reply that it appeared to be working. Sure enough, it's back up. $\endgroup$ Feb 27, 2018 at 22:14
2012-01-15
LRO was in a rouhgly 185x40 km orbit: hou.usra.edu/meetings/leag2014/presentations/keller.pdf $\endgroup$