1
$\begingroup$

How much uplink capacity (in terms of GB per day) is typical for a satellite in LEO? What aspects determine how much data can be transferred back to the earth?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you only want to look at the satellite, or should answers involve availability of receiving stations? $\endgroup$ – Jan Doggen Dec 6 '16 at 12:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What type of satellite, and what era? Each application has different demands. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Dec 6 '16 at 12:53
  • $\begingroup$ @Hobbes I am not interested in a particular type of application, more downlink capacity as an absolute constraint. $\endgroup$ – Matthew Snape Dec 7 '16 at 11:40
  • $\begingroup$ @JanDoggen Yes I am interested in recieving stations and other external constraints. $\endgroup$ – Matthew Snape Dec 7 '16 at 11:40
4
$\begingroup$

Worldview-4, a high-resolution imaging satellite that has just been launched in LEO, downlinks up to 18 Terabytes per day:

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2016/september/ssc-space-WorldView4-Launch.html

This is achieved through a network of ground stations all over the globe, and a high-speed X-band datalink (800 Mbps). Note Worldview-4 is extremely expensive, cutting-edge technology and most (if not all) LEO imaging satellites downlink lower volumes.

Current LEO communication satellites have lower throughputs. For instance, the current Iridium satellites have only 40Mbps of crosslink throughput (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_satellite_constellation), so even if they are used at maximum capacity all day it only aggregates to 0.4 TB per day.

Edit: Typically maximum downlink volume is determined by: link budget (basically your communication hardware), energy budget (how much energy your solar panels give you and how much you allocate to the comms system), and comms passes over ground station (depends on your ground station network, you can use inter-satellite links instead). This has to match the required downlink volume, which is the data produced by your sensor (basically depends on the number of pixels of you sensor for an optical camera, and the data compression methods used) @pericynthion can probably give you real-world orders of magnitudes for cubesats.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The 18TB per day is interesting, thanks. Does the relate to the amount of data the satellite actually downlinks, or the amount it stores onboard? $\endgroup$ – Matthew Snape Dec 7 '16 at 13:44
  • $\begingroup$ The amount it downlinks. It stores only 3.2 Terabits. (which is already very high) $\endgroup$ – gosnold Dec 7 '16 at 13:47
3
$\begingroup$

The record is 134 Gbit/s. But that's a new geostationary communications satellite, i.e. the whole satellite does nothing but receive and transmit data.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But modern glas fiber sea cables offer a much higher bandwith, about 3.15 Tbit/s for TAT-14. $\endgroup$ – Uwe Jan 12 '17 at 14:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Which is why satellites are used more for broadcasting than to relay internet traffic. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Jan 12 '17 at 15:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.