I feel like we have reached a time where technology is allowing for a great deal of automation, as well as remotely-controlled machines. Testing and operation of automated motorized vehicles has been underway for several decades. Obviously there is some remote-control of spacecraft today as well.

Are there any studies or initiatives related to a manned spacecraft (as in, passengers) that require no pilot?

Note: I'm fine if there's a pilot 'just-in-case,' but that it is largely hands-off.


2 Answers 2


Yes. In fact, many crewed vehicles that have flown require little to no crew intervention, especially during the ascent and during adjustment burns - these maneuvers require such precise timing that they are better left to a computer.

Even the Space Shuttle, which as a space plane had an uncommonly complex re-entry program, required very little in the way of crew input. From this New York Times article:

The computers will be capable of autonomously handling virtually every step of the mission. The only jobs the astronauts must do are putting down the landing gear and braking on the runway.

Russia's Buran orbiter only flew autonomously on its single test flight, though it was designed to carry a crew much like the American shuttle.

I remember hearing a rumor that even in the earliest days of the Mercury program, the engineers initially wanted to strap in the astronauts and send them up as passengers with no control over the craft. They didn't even want to give them windows. As a group mostly consisting of test pilots, the Mercury 7 overruled this pretty quickly.

I remember hearing a similar rumor that Shuttle wasn't originally supposed to have flight controls (ditching them would save weight and complexity) but again, the astronauts balked.

I wasn't able to substantiate either rumor (if anyone has a source, please speak up), but it helps to show how ingrained the idea of robotic flights is in the industry.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The statement about the Mercury 7 is represented in the movie The Right Stuff (although, that's probably not proof). $\endgroup$
    – Steve
    Dec 15, 2016 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ The shuttle astronauts manually flew the last part of the landing from the turn on to the Heading Alignment Cone to touchdown. This was theoretically possible to be done automatically, and was scheduled to be tested a few times, but never actually was. $\endgroup$ Dec 16, 2016 at 2:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Steve If I recall correctly John Young also talked about that in his book though he was originally part Gemini so it's not first hand. $\endgroup$
    – JonK
    Jun 8, 2017 at 14:57

enter image description here

The (cancelled) US lifeboat for the ISS was planned to be completely automatic.

When operational, the CRV will be an emergency vehicle to return up to seven International Space Station (ISS) crewmembers to Earth. It will be carried to the space station in the cargo bay of a space shuttle and attached to a docking port. If an emergency arose that forced the ISS crew to leave the space station, the CRV would be undocked and - after a deorbit engine burn - the vehicle would return to Earth much like a space shuttle. The vehicle's life support system will have a duration of about seven hours. A steerable parafoil parachute would be deployed at an altitude of about 40,000 feet to carry it through the final descent and the landing. The CRV is being designed to fly automatically from orbit to landing using onboard navigation and flight control systems. Backup systems will allow the crew to pick a landing site and steer the parafoil to a landing, if necessary.

Note the lack of any windows!

from here / Italics mine


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.