4
$\begingroup$

In the article Breakthrough Starshot tricks out massive telescope for planet hunting there is casual mention of a "phased array of lasers in the 100GW range" that will propel a gram scale spacecraft to 0.2 c in a matter of minutes. That gave me pause, but usually when you read about huge powers of laser beams they are pulsed at nanoseconds or picoseconds, and the actual average power is modest.

But it works out. Just doing approximate math, the momentum of the spacecraft (non relativistic approximation) will be:

$$p_{sat} = m_{sat}v_{sat} = 0.2mc = \text{0.2} \times \text{0.001} \times \text{3E+08} = \text{6E+04 kg m/s.}$$

For photons, the energy is related to the momentum as simply:

$$E = pc$$

so you don't have to specify any particular wavelength. If the sail were a perfect mirror at normal incidence, reflecting light gives you double the momentum kick, since you're actually reversing the momentum of the photon, but let's assume 50% efficiency. Thus

$$E_{tot} = p_{sat}c = \text{6E+04} \times \text{3E+08 kg m}{}^2 / \text{s}^2$$

or 1.8E+13 Joules, or, yes, 100 Gigawatts for the time it takes to cook a three minute egg.

For three full minutes, this laser array will be using power at roughly the same rate that the US uses at peak demand. I think the idea is that you can't do it slowly, or the satellite will get too far away too soon.

There can't be a single laser with this much power, it would be a very large phased array of smaller lasers. That means they would have to be phase-coherent at optical frequencies to synthesize a beam spot on the moving satellite narrow enough to get most of the power on to it's sail.

Is there any quantitative discussion how this power might be stored and then delivered, and how atmospheric seeing might be compensated coherently across the entire distributed array simultaneously?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I've heard them say that it is based on the assumption that relevant technologies will keep on doubling their capability per cost every other year until several magnitudes of improvement has been achieved. And maybe it will, we haven't hit the wall yet. If the electric effect in the US today is enough, that shows that it is actually happening. Compare that with the electrical effect produced in the world 50 years ago, and extrapolate that trend 50 years ahead. The concept has bigger problems than electric effect, so it is about time to get started working on them. $\endgroup$ – LocalFluff Feb 4 '17 at 16:17
  • $\begingroup$ @LocalFluff that makes sense. So I've picked two aspects here that I'd like to look into myself, and I'm asking if there's any material out there already. I'm not asking "how will they do it", I'm asking what are the thoughts at the moment so I don't waste time duplicating. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Feb 4 '17 at 16:39
  • $\begingroup$ the current most powerful laser (with pulse lengths longer than ~ 1 s) is MIRACL, at 1 MW, this can work for a few minutes before it needs to cool down. Continuous-duty lasers have less power than this. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Dec 11 '18 at 15:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.