While watching the SES-10 flight, starting a little after T+1:30, I noticed that the direction of the first-stage exhaust plume started to diverge from the alignment of the rocket body.

SES-10 at T+1:42, plume deflection slight but definite

The divergence angle increased continuously until the plume became too tenuous to clearly determine the direction it was pointing.

SES-10 at T+1:54, plume deflection much more dramatic

After the 2-min mark, the plume appears something like 30 degrees off-line (quite foreshortened, so the actual divergence angle must be smaller).

enter image description here

I thought briefly that it might be deflecting to correct for an engine shutdown, but from 2:02 to 2:14, the 8 separate plumes from outer engines are distinctly visible and angled in the expected directions.

I would expect any deliberate angle-of-attack on ascent to be quite small, and that a gimbaling of the engines that substantial would turn the stack very rapidly. At that speed and altitude, dynamic pressure should still be substantial (perhaps 7-8kPa?).

What explains this observation? Is this just the effect of a strong crosswind, either pushing the plume aside, or forcing the engines to gimbal to correct for the rocket being pushed off trajectory?

Here's a more complete set of images in the sequence.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Raze those numbers are not inclination but position in GEO, target inclination is very close to 0° afaik. And parking orbit inclination is somewhere around 28°? $\endgroup$
    – jkavalik
    Apr 1, 2017 at 8:34
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Raze that's "Longitude: 67° West (Intended)", not latitude. GEO satellites are all positioned at 0° inclination, but they are all "hanging" over different meridians. $\endgroup$
    – jkavalik
    Apr 1, 2017 at 20:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The final position of a geosynchronous orbit has zero effect on the orbital velocity at the end of the ascent. All orbital launches need to transition from vertical ascent to horizontal, and they do it very gradually, with minimal deviations from zero angle of attack. That is not what's going on here. $\endgroup$ Apr 2, 2017 at 3:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Good discussion on reddit, but I do not see a consclusive answer yet. reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/62uq2b/… $\endgroup$
    – geoffc
    Apr 2, 2017 at 11:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ahhh, I think the thrust is inline with the rocket body, but it's flying a high angle of attack, and the plume is being directed by the 1+km/s airstream. $\endgroup$ Apr 2, 2017 at 16:53

1 Answer 1


I believe the visual effect is due to the rocket flying a small positive angle of attack at the end of the first stage burn, combined with a steeply foreshortened camera view.

According to the simulation data at FlightClub (https://www.flightclub.io/results/?code=SS10), the rocket flies a positive angle-of-attack during the end of the first stage burn, peaking at about 4.6 degrees AoA.

This means that the rocket body is tilted relative to the oncoming airstream. The engine gimbals are nearly in-line with the rocket body; in fact, depending on the distribution of mass within the rocket, they may have to turn very slightly in the opposite direction of the plume deflection to keep the rocket from flipping!

The oncoming airstream at ~1000m/s then deflects the plume parallel to the direction of motion, up to 4.6 degrees from the line of the rocket body. Despite the thin air, dynamic pressure is still quite high due to the high speeds -- ~10kPa at the 2:00 mark, about 1/3 of Max Q -- so it forces the plume into line.

The camera is at the launch site, and the rocket is far downrange, so the view is severely foreshortened, which increases the apparent angle of the deflection from ~4 degrees to ~30 degrees.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ WOW! FlightClub is sooo cool! How am I only learning about this tool now?! $\endgroup$
    – ChrisR
    Apr 2, 2017 at 19:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ChrisR apparently the cool people hang out in Reddit. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Apr 3, 2017 at 19:17
  • $\begingroup$ @ChrisR which I don't, so I'm not ;) $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Apr 4, 2017 at 8:22
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @ChrisR The first rule of Flight Club... $\endgroup$ Apr 4, 2017 at 18:24
  • $\begingroup$ @NathanOsman D'o! Now they'll never let me in. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Apr 5, 2017 at 14:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.