Is it possible to use carbon monoxide as propellant for a rocket?

For example, carbon dioxide from the atmosphere of Mars could be transformed to carbon monoxide and oxygen via photochemical reduction using a photocatalytic process, and unlike the Sabatier reaction (producing methane), precious water is not consumed in the process.

Could the resulting products then be used as a potential bi-propellant?

$$2\,{\rm CO}_2 + 2h\nu\ \to\ 2\,{\rm CO} + {\rm O}_2$$

There may be issues of storage of LOX or LCO, but provided those are addressed somehow, could a rocket engine or thruster use these effectively?

  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photochemical_carbon_dioxide_reduction $\endgroup$ – Antonio Cipolla Apr 23 '17 at 10:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is a pretty interesting question actually! Split one oxygen from CO2 and you still have a gas (two in fact!), but split both and all you've got is a lump of coal unless you want to start spending your water. Could come in handy for some local applications, atmospheric recon craft for example. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Apr 23 '17 at 12:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As other gases, carbon monoxide could be liquified by low temperature. LCO (-191.5 °C) is colder than LOX (-183 °C) but not so cold as LH2 (-252°C) We should compare the specific impulse of this propellant with other combinations. $\endgroup$ – Uwe Apr 23 '17 at 14:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ carbon monoxide is a less efficient combustible than methane but apparently will be cheaper to product on Mars $\endgroup$ – Antonio Cipolla Apr 23 '17 at 14:02
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Here are two papers from NASA about this propellant combination: ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960045922.pdf ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19910014990.pdf $\endgroup$ – Uwe Apr 23 '17 at 14:23

Yes, it could be. The ISP for CO/ O2 is about 200. Compare that to Methane, with a specific impulse of 299, and you can see it's really not that great.

Of some related interest is a hot Carbon Dioxide rocket, with a theoretical ISP of about 260. This would work for short surface to surface hops, but not beyond orbit.

  • $\begingroup$ Reading the paper in the report they reffer to ISP in the 260-290 range dependent on chamber preasure. Is the 200 ISP a typo? $\endgroup$ – lijat May 29 '20 at 11:20

In TECHPORT_18280 published by nasa the summary talks about work on this. The teoretical ISP is aparently relativly high (324s) but the mixture apears to be hard to ignite in a safe way. The report then goes on about how such a safe ignition can be achived.

TECHPORT_18280 https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/o2-co-ignition-system-for-mars-sample-return-missions-phase-i


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.