6
$\begingroup$

The Parker Solar Probe will experience forces and torques as it passes within about 8.5 solar radii of the Sun's surface that even a General Products hull will not protect it from.

How large will the tidal acceleration be along the 3 meter length of the spacecraft at perihelion? Will it be detectable in any way?

Will there be any (real or effective) torques that will tend to rotate the spacecraft during it's closest flybys? What about effects due to the oblates of the sun?

Will any of these be a new record - or have Cassini or Juno experienced greater effects during their closes approaches to Saturn and Jupiter already?

enter image description here

above: Parker Solar Probe cropped, from here.

enter image description here

above: screen shot from NASA's Solar Probe Plus Fact Sheet note: the link seems to be dead now, but there is plenty of related information available at http://solarprobe.jhuapl.edu/index.php#spacecraft

enter image description here

above: Illustration of Parker Solar Probe's orbit, from here.

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Solar corona density is about 10^15 particles per m^3, mostly hydrogen - that converts to 1.6x10^-12 kg/m^3. That corresponds to ~400km LEO altitude - atmospheric drag similar to that experienced by ISS, except at 195km/s instead of 7.6km/s. I bet all other effects will be overshadowed by this. $\endgroup$ – SF. May 31 '17 at 12:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SF. hey wait - which is moving faster, the spacecraft or the protons? If there is drag, will it be tangential or radial? $\endgroup$ – uhoh May 31 '17 at 13:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Both (or diagonal). Solar wind is outwards, supposedly at 400km/s if I got the sources right - not sure if that's the state inside the corona, or just "out around here". $\endgroup$ – SF. May 31 '17 at 13:30
  • $\begingroup$ The probe will be moving along a ~200 km/s transverse to the solar radial direction and the solar wind speed varies between ~300–800 km/s depending on location and time. If we use the $10^{15} \ m^{-3}$ density and 600 km/s for the speed, we get a ram pressure of ~0.3 Pa. If we naively assume the spacecraft has 1 $m^{2}$ of surface area, then there will be ~0.3 N of force acting on it for the perihelion pass. PSP launched with a mass of ~685 kg, so it would experience an acceleration of 0.00044 $m \ s^{-2}$. $\endgroup$ – honeste_vivere Sep 2 '18 at 13:11
1
$\begingroup$

The largest torque affecting the Parker Solar Probe during its closest approach is caused by the solar wind blasting against the heat shield (Thermal Protection System, a.k.a TPS).

The TPS is like an umbrella held facing into a strong wind. The wind whips against it, and tries to force it around away from the wind. The spacecraft has to "fight" against this force to maintain it's proper attitude with the TPS pointed right at the sun and right into the solar wind.

To "fight" against the solar wind, the primary mechanism is the spacecraft's reaction wheels. They are mounted at angles to each other (there are four) and they are spun up or slowed down to create the counter force to the solar wind acting on the TPS. The spacecraft subsystem that controls the wheels is the Guidance and Control (G&C) system. Fifty times a second (50 Hz) the inertial measurement unit provides change-in-attitude readings and the G&C system calculates the reaction wheel response required to counter act the change and bring the spacecraft back to the correct attitude with the TPS pointing at the sun.

In addition to controlling attitude with the reaction wheels, the spacecraft thrusters can also be used, but this is not normally done because it degrades the science measurements. However, as the reaction wheels counter the torques from the solar wind, they wind up and spin faster and faster. In order to bring the speed back down, the spacecraft periodically performs a "monmentum dump" by firing the thrusters to counter-act the wheel's momentum and allow them to slow down to a manageable rate.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Great answer! When I asked this question I was also wondering about any subtle tidal effects, either Newtonian or due to general relativity, that could produce local forces and torques on the spacecraft and it's components. The effect is usually fairly small, but moving at such a high velocity in such a large gravitational gradient, will there be forces and/or torques due to these as well? I guess Larry Niven's short story Neutron Star made a big impression on me. (e.g. this question) $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 7 '18 at 7:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Unfortunately, I am not knowledgeable enough of the basic physics to be able to answer that question from a theoretical point of view. From a practical point of view, I have never heard any of the spacecraft G&C team talk about or worry about such effects. This leads me to believe that, to the extent that they exist they are relatively (<- pun ) minor.Any and all torques, including mechanical impact from dust (as discussed in another answer) would be "summed up" into the IMU measurements and accounted for in that way. $\endgroup$ – That60sKid Jan 7 '18 at 18:36
  • $\begingroup$ OK, but "How large" appears in both the title and the body of the question. Can you post an approximate numerical value for the torques you do discuss? $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 8 '18 at 8:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I can ask someone familiar with the G&C analysis if they can give some plausible numbers. Of course they would have to have a very good idea of the forces they are dealing with, but they also have to account for the "unknown unknown" by adding margin to all calculations and simulations. What they do is repetitive Monte Carlo simulations using a range of assumptions and random events. They run these over and over to test the various scenarios against their design and algorithms and make various tweaks. I'll see what they say. $\endgroup$ – That60sKid Jan 9 '18 at 1:19
  • $\begingroup$ Congrats on Parker's success so far btw! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Dec 6 '18 at 0:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.