4
$\begingroup$

I read that with our current ion propulsion technology it is possible we could send a craft moving the maximum of 100km per second, or around 62 miles. However we seem to be limited by how strong of a power generator we are able to put aboard the craft.. Is it possible that with enough power we could accelerate a spacecraft beyond this 100km per second limit? What is the maximum speed we could send a craft moving in space at with our current ion engine technology?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ (0.999999...)c. $\endgroup$ – Erik Jun 30 '17 at 1:01
  • $\begingroup$ @Erik Not without fantasy engineering. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jun 30 '17 at 1:08
  • $\begingroup$ But it is possible with current technology. $\endgroup$ – Erik Jun 30 '17 at 1:09
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Erik It's really not -- see my answer. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jun 30 '17 at 1:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let us continue this discussion in chat. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jun 30 '17 at 1:45
12
$\begingroup$

The limit isn't due to power, but to engine lifetime and fuel limits.

Ion engines produce very little thrust, so in order to reach speeds of 100km/s they must accelerate continuously for months or years. The Dawn spacecraft, for example, was built with three redundant ion thrusters to extend its lifetime, and got nowhere near 100km/s; it carried enough propellant to change its speed by about 10km/s, and took 15000 hours (~1.7 years) of continuous thrust to change its speed by 4.3km/s.

To achieve a ∆v of 100km/s with an ion engine like those on Dawn (with a specific impulse of 3100 s (exhaust velocity of 30400 m/s)) we turn to the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation:

$$\Delta v = v_\text{e} \ln \frac {m_0} {m_f}$$

Where $v_\text{e}$ is the rocket exhaust velocity and ${m_0}$ and ${m_f}$ are the mass of the craft full of fuel and empty respectively.

$$100000 = 30400 \ln \frac {m_0} {m_f} \Rightarrow 3.29 = \ln \frac {m_0} {m_f} \Rightarrow \frac {m_0} {m_f} = e^{3.29} = 26.8$$

So an ion-thruster spacecraft intending to reach 100km/s must carry 26 times its dry mass in xenon propellant. This is an extremely high mass ratio, not generally achievable in a single-stage spacecraft. A two- or three-stage spacecraft could do it with reasonable mass ratios.

Ion engines are already very power-hungry, and need to be paired with a lot of mass in solar panels or RTGs. More powerful thrusters could increase the exhaust velocity by a small amount, driving down the mass ratio, but at the cost of greatly increasing the dry mass with the larger power supply.

Note that I'm referring to a change in speed or ∆v throughout this answer, rather than a maximum speed. This is because the speed of objects in space must be described relative to a particular reference point, and speed limits don't work the way they do for Earth-bound vehicles.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's a bit of a nitpick, but shouldn't that be $\Rightarrow$ (\Rightarrow) rather than $\rightarrow$ (\rightarrow)? The first time I read this, I read $\rightarrow$ as $\to$ (the "goes to" operator; in LaTeX, \to). $\endgroup$ – a CVn Jun 30 '17 at 7:58
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelKjörling Thank you -- it looked wrong to me but I wasn't sure if there was a formal convention. \rightarrow was the first thing I tried that looked vaguely useful. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jun 30 '17 at 14:19
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know if it's formally correct, but it is what I learned back in school. $\endgroup$ – a CVn Jun 30 '17 at 17:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.