4
$\begingroup$

I read that with our current ion propulsion technology it is possible we could send a craft moving the maximum of 100km per second, or around 62 miles. However we seem to be limited by how strong of a power generator we are able to put aboard the craft.. Is it possible that with enough power we could accelerate a spacecraft beyond this 100km per second limit? What is the maximum speed we could send a craft moving in space at with our current ion engine technology?

$\endgroup$
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ (0.999999...)c. $\endgroup$ – Erik Jun 30 '17 at 1:01
  • $\begingroup$ @Erik Not without fantasy engineering. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jun 30 '17 at 1:08
  • $\begingroup$ But it is possible with current technology. $\endgroup$ – Erik Jun 30 '17 at 1:09
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Erik It's really not -- see my answer. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jun 30 '17 at 1:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let us continue this discussion in chat. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jun 30 '17 at 1:45
13
$\begingroup$

The limit isn't due to power, but to engine lifetime and fuel limits.

Ion engines produce very little thrust, so in order to reach speeds of 100km/s they must accelerate continuously for months or years. The Dawn spacecraft, for example, was built with three redundant ion thrusters to extend its lifetime, and got nowhere near 100km/s; it carried enough propellant to change its speed by about 10km/s, and took 15000 hours (~1.7 years) of continuous thrust to change its speed by 4.3km/s.

To achieve a ∆v of 100km/s with an ion engine like those on Dawn (with a specific impulse of 3100 s (exhaust velocity of 30400 m/s)) we turn to the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation:

$$\Delta v = v_\text{e} \ln \frac {m_0} {m_f}$$

Where $v_\text{e}$ is the rocket exhaust velocity and ${m_0}$ and ${m_f}$ are the mass of the craft full of fuel and empty respectively.

$$100000 = 30400 \ln \frac {m_0} {m_f} \Rightarrow 3.29 = \ln \frac {m_0} {m_f} \Rightarrow \frac {m_0} {m_f} = e^{3.29} = 26.8$$

So an ion-thruster spacecraft intending to reach 100km/s must carry 26 times its dry mass in xenon propellant. This is an extremely high mass ratio, not generally achievable in a single-stage spacecraft. A two- or three-stage spacecraft could do it with reasonable mass ratios.

Ion engines are already very power-hungry, and need to be paired with a lot of mass in solar panels or RTGs. More powerful thrusters could increase the exhaust velocity by a small amount, driving down the mass ratio, but at the cost of greatly increasing the dry mass with the larger power supply.

Note that I'm referring to a change in speed or ∆v throughout this answer, rather than a maximum speed. This is because the speed of objects in space must be described relative to a particular reference point, and speed limits don't work the way they do for Earth-bound vehicles.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's a bit of a nitpick, but shouldn't that be $\Rightarrow$ (\Rightarrow) rather than $\rightarrow$ (\rightarrow)? The first time I read this, I read $\rightarrow$ as $\to$ (the "goes to" operator; in LaTeX, \to). $\endgroup$ – a CVn Jun 30 '17 at 7:58
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelKjörling Thank you -- it looked wrong to me but I wasn't sure if there was a formal convention. \rightarrow was the first thing I tried that looked vaguely useful. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jun 30 '17 at 14:19
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know if it's formally correct, but it is what I learned back in school. $\endgroup$ – a CVn Jun 30 '17 at 17:55
4
$\begingroup$

You have it correct, but you are looking at a very narrow range of ISP.

  • The BepiColombo mission to mercury uses an ion thruster with a ISP of 4,200 seconds(41,202 M/s). The same formula yields a mass ratio of 11.325.

  • The NEXIS ion thruster can achieve 8000 seconds (78,200 m/s)

  • The European DS4G innovative thruster manages 19,300 seconds (188,200 m/s) exceeding the 100 km/sec from the above question.

  • Lithium fed GIT (gridded ion thrusters) have demonstrated 50,000 - 80,000 seconds of ISP(490 km/s to 780 km/sec).

The problem is not so much mass ratio but power applied to the thruster and electrode erosion. The DS4G is the first thruster to have concentrated power in a small form, what is needed a nuclear reactor delivering 100 of KW's or maybe Mw of power.

With Megawatts of power it is possible to have Ion thrusters exceeding 100,000 seconds of ISP (over 1,000 km/sec).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hey! Great first answer, and welcome! I've made a few minor formatting edits - if I've gone overboard, please feel free to rollback. $\endgroup$ – 0xDBFB7 Jan 19 at 22:41
  • $\begingroup$ +1 I've just asked What is a Lithium fed GIT? How does it work? $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 19 at 23:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.