I'm trying to understand the equations of motion for a rocket launched from earth, through the atmosphere, and into LEO. I found a set of ordinary differential equations which describe the motion of the rocket (see this reference, slide 3). Below is a diagram of which should help to describe the variables in the equation:

enter image description here

The differential equations are:

$$\dot{v}=-\frac{ksin(\gamma)}{r^2}-\frac{D}{m}+\frac{Tcos(\phi_T)}{m}$$ $$\dot{\gamma}=-\frac{kcos(\gamma)}{vr^2}+\frac{L}{mv}+\frac{Tsin(\phi_T)}{mv}+\frac{vcos(\gamma)}{r}$$ $$\dot{\nu}=v\frac{cos(\gamma)}{r}$$ $$\dot{r}=vsin(\gamma)$$ $$\dot{m}=-T/I_{sp}$$

I recognize the first equation as the equation for linear acceleration, where I think $k=\mu=GM$ is the gravitational constant times the mass of earth (please correct me if I'm wrong). I don't know what the second equation represents or how it was obtained. Can anyone give me some insight into how this equation is derived? Is it the statement of the conservation of some forces? If so, what forces in particular?

I'm not even entirely sure that this is the proper form of the dynamic model for the rocket's trajectory. I tried cross-validating this model with other models to see if this is correct. In this process, I found an answer on another stack exchange question which almost describes the same equation, but with an additional $\frac{v}{r}$ term in the $\dot{\gamma}$ equation. If I were to add this term to the $\dot{\gamma}$ equation, what would it mean? What force does it describe?

Also, I'm having a little bit of trouble understanding the notation, since the variables are not explicitly defined anywhere in the document. I think the D and L represent drag and lift forces. If so, I'm not sure why lift forces are not included in the $\dot{v}$ equation or why they appear only in the $\dot{\gamma}$ equation. The term T seems to represent the thrust of the rocket, which acts at an angle $\phi_T$ from the normal direction to the surface of the (perfectly circular) earth. The angle $\gamma$ seems to be the angle from the velocity vector to the local horizon. Have I correctly summarized these variables?

Any help understanding this equation would be greatly appreciated.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The v˙ equation is dealing only with forces that act along the direction of the instantaneous velocity vector, that is why L is not included. The γ˙equation deals only with forces that act perpendicular to the instantaneous velocity vector, that is why D is not included. I think ϕT is not what you describe, but instead is the angle between the thrust vector and the instantaneous velocity vector. Set up your frame of reference in regards to the velocity vector and this will make more sense to you. $\endgroup$ Sep 8 '17 at 2:03
  • $\begingroup$ @OrganicMarble: If $\phi_T=0$, then the thrust contributes only in the direction of the velocity vector, so what you say makes a lot of sense! The lift vector is, by definition, orthogonal to the direction of drag, so that makes sense too. Still, this would suggest that the acceleration in the direction normal to the velocity is somehow characterized by $mv\dot{\gamma}$. What would this term represent? Some sort of angular acceleration? $\endgroup$
    – Paul
    Sep 8 '17 at 3:33
  • $\begingroup$ @Paul $\dot{\gamma}$ is the speed with which the velocity's direction changes. It is equal to $a_\bot/v$, where $a_\bot$ is the (linear) acceleration in the direction perpendicular to the velocity, so $mv\dot{\gamma} = ma_\bot$ is the component of the total force perpendicular to the velocity. $\endgroup$
    – Litho
    Sep 8 '17 at 8:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Paul By the way, you forgot to divide the first term in the second formula by $v$. This $v$ is there in the reference you linked. You also skipped the term $v\cos(\gamma)/r$, which describes the change in the angle between the velocity and the horizontal direction due to the change of the horizontal direction. $\endgroup$
    – Litho
    Sep 8 '17 at 8:46
  • $\begingroup$ @litho: Thanks! I corrected those two terms. I'm curious though... If $vcos(\gamma)/r$ describes the change in angle due to normal forces, shouldn't the first equation have a term of $v^2sin(\gamma)/r$ To describe a similar force in the direction parallel to the velocity vector? $\endgroup$
    – Paul
    Sep 8 '17 at 13:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.