Would it be efficient to use water as a coolant in a hydrolox rocket, then feed the steam after the water has boiled (due to heat transfer from the engine nozzle) into the combustion chamber, so as to add mass to the exhaust plume? Correct me if I'm wrong but if the thrust to weight ratio of this coolant/thrust system is higher than 1 then it allows for an improvement in the efficiency of the rocket.


1 Answer 1


It would work, but it would be far from optimal.

Heat recovered from the nozzle would result in steam much colder than combustion chamber temperature (after all, we never allow the nozzle to reach these temperatures, that's what cooling is all about, so the steam wouldn't heat to temperatures higher than the nozzle). That would cool the combustion products, resulting in lower performance. Additionally, we'd need to use extra energy to bring the liquid hydrogen up to temperatures of combustion, which again reduces performance per unit of mass of fuel.

Using hydrogen as coolant we kill two birds with one stone - we keep the nozzle cool, and we heat the hydrogen so it performs better during combustion. The combustion creates far more than enough energy to evaporate all the liquid hydrogen, oxygen, and heat the resulting steam to the desired temperatures, but every little bit helps - the fuel being the coolant returns the energy harvested from the nozzle to the combustion chamber, then releases more, burning. If you used water, it would return the energy from the nozzle, but then it would absorb more from combustion as it's inert, and can't provide more.

Simply put, if you replace water with LH2 as coolant, you're replacing the inert propellant that can't produce any extra energy, just transfer it from place to place, with propellant that not only can transfer the energy from the nozzle but also produce a lot more of it.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the detailed and swift response, I am developing a homemade rocket and was attempting to avoid cooling using liquid hydrogen, so as to lower costs by using water. Is it feasible to use water cooling at all, or would it end up being cheaper to use the LH2? $\endgroup$
    – C. Bird
    Sep 11, 2017 at 1:30
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @C.Bird: Homemade rocket using LH2? Are you suicidal?! Even giants like SpaceX avoid that stuff, because it's so difficult and ungrateful to handle. Not just as coolant - as fuel too. $\endgroup$
    – SF.
    Sep 11, 2017 at 1:35
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps I'll stick with H2 in its gaseous form, as with the oxygen. @SF. $\endgroup$
    – C. Bird
    Sep 11, 2017 at 1:40
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @C.Bird: Stick with nitrous oxide N2O and any stable room-temperature solid or liquid fuel. (gaseous fuel/oxidizer necessitates high-pressure tanks and provides very lousy dry:wet mass ratio. Nitrous oxide is reasonably safe and will give you far more oxygen per kilogram of tank+oxidizer than gaseous oxygen. And it works fine with most solid and liquid fuels.) Plus for flight duration typical for amateur rocketry, you just don't bother with cooling the nozzle - you'll run out of fuel before the nozzle can lose structural integrity due to the temperature. $\endgroup$
    – SF.
    Sep 11, 2017 at 2:01
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm, okay. Gasoline perhaps. Thanks for the info. @SF. $\endgroup$
    – C. Bird
    Sep 11, 2017 at 2:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.