I've been reading about accelerometers. On earth, in a lecture demonstration, in a table-top experiment, they will generate a signal equal to the sum of the acceleration you'd like to measure plus the local acceleration due to gravity and all of the other accelerations of our laboratory frame.
Local gravity on the Earth's surface varies a few tenths of a percent; strongest at the North pole and weakest in equatorial mountains, due to variations in the distance from the center of the Earth and other mass-distribution effects.
There is also a variation in the centripetal acceleration due to the Earth's rotation from pole to equator, which points away from the Earth and further decreases local acceleration near the Equator. All together, it's about a 0.5% maximum difference.
There is a great inventory of these variations in this answer and I'd recommend a visit there if you are interested.
But my question is about daily variation in local acceleration due to the rotation of the Earth with respect to the Sun and Moon.
I was reading the document Precise Measurement of Mass, presented at the 60th Annual Conference of the Society of Allied Weight Engineers Arlington, Texas May 21-23, 2001 by Richard Boynton of Space-Electronics.
One statement on page 8 surprised me:
1.5 Tidal variations An object on the surface of the earth is attracted to every celestial body. Most of these masses are too far away to have any significance on weight, but the sun and the moon do have a significance. If you have a scale whose accuracy is 0.003 % or better, you will notice that the weight of an object varies as a function of the time of day. This effect is most pronounced during spring and fall when the sun and moon align. This produces the “neap tides” that often cause flooding of marinas at these critical dates. (emphasis added)
The figure of 0.003% is repeated twice more in other sections.
I have tried to reproduce this number, but it seems high by about two orders of magnitude.
The tidal effect I know how to calculate goes as follows. I like to imagine being an astronaut in the ISS, orbiting the Earth. At that low altitude Earth's gravity is almost as strong as it is on the surface, but an astronaut in the center of the ISS will not experience any acceleration with respect to the ISS since they are in the same orbit.
However if an astronaut moves to a point toward or away from the Earth, they will experience a tidal acceleration that points away from the center of the ISS, and which will be proportional in 1st order to the distance from the center. For a shift of $\pm \Delta r$ from the orbital distance $r_0$, the change in acceleration is:
$$\Delta a = \frac{-GM_E}{(r_0-\Delta r)^2} - \frac{-GM_E}{(r_0+\Delta r)^2}.$$
For $\pm$ 1 meter at the ISS's $r_0$ of say 6378+400 km, that's a $\Delta a$ of about 5E-06 m/s^2, or 5E-07 g.
Similarly, using the standard gravitational parameter $GM$ from the Sun and Moon of 1.327E+20 and 4.905E+12 and distances $r_0$ of 1.5E+11 and 3.8E+08 meters, and now using the radius of the Earth for $\Delta r$, I get $\Delta a$'s of 1E-06 and 2E-06 m/s^2, or 1E-07 and 2E-07 g.
When those add together, it's 3E-07 g, or 0.00003%, one hundred times smaller than the amount stated in the paper.
Question: Have I done my calculation correctly? Is the figure in the paper a factor of 100 too high?
note 1: 0.003% results if you make the change to percent (by multiplying by 100) twice.
note 2: FWIW, the paper points out that the company is selling scales with a precision of 0.002%.