5
$\begingroup$

Reading this question Why are rocket engines operating above 100% often considered nominal? leads me to a question about throttling back the SSMEs in the later stages of a Shuttle Launch to limit G forces on the astronauts. If the SSMEs were not throttled back, what would have been the anticipated G Forces on the astronauts at the end of the main SSME burn time?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The 3 g limit during the launch phase was in place for payload and payload berthing reasons, not to limit the forces on the crew. $\endgroup$ – Digger Sep 28 '17 at 20:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Digger, Upon additional digging, I came across the following answer which backs up your assertion that the G limit was more for payload than crew accommodation, as earlier launches had significantly higher G loadings during launch to space. space.stackexchange.com/questions/7829/… $\endgroup$ – Milwrdfan Sep 28 '17 at 20:44
9
$\begingroup$

Stealing the mass-at-MECO number from this answer, and using the 104.5% thrust numbers for 3 SSMEs from here, I get

(3 x (490,000) lbf / 308650 lbm ) = ~ 4.75 g's

Sanity check

(3 x (.65 x 490,000) lbf / 308650 lbm ) = ~ 3.1 g's

Using the approximate 65% power level at shutdown, assuming that the thrust varies linearly with throttle percent (and ignoring that they normally only throttled to 67%) gives the expected approximate 3 g's

Info on nominal throttle settings in the answer to this question: Which STS mission raised the normal engine throttle above 100%, and what change to the SSME made that possible?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.