4
$\begingroup$

Casually reading “orbital mechanics for engineering students” on rigid body attitude dynamics, i see the following passage:

$$M_{net}=\dot{H}_{rel} + \Omega\times H$$ Keep in mind that, whereas $\Omega$ (the angular velocity of the moving xyz coordinate system) and $\omega$ (the angular velocity of the rigid body itself) are both absolute kinematic quantities, ... If the comoving frame is rigidly attached to the body frame, then ... $\Omega=\omega$.

I can’t fathom any plausible reason why one would have $\Omega\ne\omega$ at all, much less for a satellite. Is there a situation that comes up where it would be useful to describe a rigid body satellite with a rotating coordinate axis that differs from the rotation of the body itself? It seems like the authors are extremely careful to avoid saying that $\Omega=\omega$ universally, which makes me suspect that there may be cases that come up where it is best to keep them separate. What are those situations in the context of a satellite’s attitude dynamics?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Angular velocity can be expressed in any reference frame, expressing $\omega$ in a reference frame fixed to the body ($\omega=\Omega$) has the advantage of obtaining a constant inertia matrix (for a rigid body) with respect to time, so @uhoh I do not understand the Hubble issue that you are pointing out. I can only think of situations where you have attached moving parts to your satellite, so "no matter" what reference frame you choose you cannot have a constant inertia matrix. $\endgroup$ – Julio Nov 17 '17 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Julio oh, I think I've completely misread the paragraph. Never mind. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Nov 17 '17 at 13:02
2
$\begingroup$

Obviously this depends on the purpose of the satellite.

If the satellite is a space telescope, it needs to focus on distant stars; $\omega = 0$.

If it's a spy satellite focusing on a specific point on the surface, it will turn to aim at that point.

In case of satellites in highly eccentric orbit, angular velocity is often controlled on ad-hoc basis - since $\Omega$ is non-constant, the satellite traveling much slower near apoapsis than near periapsis; meanwhile $\omega$ "left to its own devices" would be constant; if the satellite is to focus at Earth, it needs to be rotated actively (example: Molinya orbit satellites).

There are many other applications where specific spin, or lack of spin is desirable - orienting panels towards the Sun, scanning surface in narrow strips through narrow beam, inertial stabilization, artificial gravity - in all these cases $\omega$ will be "custom".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.