6
$\begingroup$

In Ars' series on the Apollo program Eric tells a story about the Lunar Module from NASA lore...

...recounted in Apollo: The Race to the Moon, a technician working with a test version of the vehicle absentmindedly clicked the cap of his ballpoint pen against a filled fuel tank. This minute amount of pressure opened a small leak in the tank, and the thin stream of propellant sliced off his finger with surgical precision.

Did this really happen? And if so how was the tank designed to be strong enough to withstand take-off, but so weak another way?

Tom Kelly's book talks a lot about the weight saving efforts and the strict QA around the tanks due to the danger they could pose (going so far as to reject a tank that passed all the tests because it was inexplicably off-colour!) but it seemed this was precisely so they would be anything but fragile..

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The tanks of the LM descent module seem to have been designed for a pressure of up to 300 psi (20 bar). Water jet cutters operate at pressures 100 times higher. 20 bar is lower than today's pressure washers. Those can reach 200 bar, and that's enough to cut off a finger, it seems. Whether 20 bar would be enough?

Wall thickness of the ascent engine propellant lines was 1.2 mm (0.049"), these ran at similar pressures. (couldn't find wall thickness of the tanks).

It's certainly possible to design very thin structures for use at high pressure, close to their breaking strength. A slight increase in pressure can overstress the tank and create a leak. Compare to a balloon: a tiny puncture can rip the balloon apart.

I haven't been able to find other sources for the story though.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.