4
$\begingroup$

I'm sure it's possible, but would it be wise to place a hex-cluster of SpaceX boosters around a central booster to get a very large payload, or one going to a very high orbit, into space? Maybe even to the extent of the central booster staying in orbit with a payload, like a personnel/supply capsule, that will later deorbit?

Anybody heard of any concepts, designs, plans or rumors regarding this idea?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ On a Q&A site, you don't need to, nor should you, suffix your question title with the term "question". We know it's a question :) $\endgroup$ – ReactingToAngularVues Jan 17 '18 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ SpaceX have never published any hints they worked, or even thought about, adding more than 2 boosters to the central core. The plan has always been F9->FH->much bigger rocket (initially labeled as Falcon XX, later BFR). $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Jan 18 '18 at 7:20
11
$\begingroup$

First issue is that even though Falcon Heavy is claimed to have a max payload of 50,000+ lbs to LEO, it turns out the payload adapter is much more limited, with two models, the bigger limited to 24,000 lbs range.

Users manual on Payload adapters

Second issue is that the fairing is volume limited, today, and increasing the payload would not help, since the density is usually not high enough to max out the mass allowed, before hitting volume limits.

Of course, if you are developing an asparagus booster as suggested, a new payload adapter or new fairing seem like likely developments.

However the fairing is tricky as it is already a hammerhead fairing, with a diameter of about 5m, and the core stage being 3m or so. Thus it already overhangs 1m on either side. It would be tricky to make it very much larger.

Length wise the booster is almost entirely maxed out in terms of bending and aerodynamic stability. Thus a bigger fairing is tricky with the current core stages, which your suggestion would be to keep in service, just more per launch.

Third, the current method of assembling and managing and launching the booster is designed to work in a flat layout. This would require much ground support equipment changes. Again, if needed, changes can be made.

However the real question seems to be, is SpaceX looking into any of these options, and there the answer is a clear "No". As Elon discussed at the IAC in 2017, they plan on replacing everything with BFR/BFS as a way of funding their Mars program.

I.e. They will launch satellites, ISS cargo and crew missions on BFR/BFS and use funding from those missions to help fund the development of the booster and ship.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Add four additional landing pads at KSC, and the fun of coordinating the 7 boosters coming back. $\endgroup$ – Diego Sánchez Jan 18 '18 at 17:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.