8
$\begingroup$

This is not about a prediction of Starman's fate, although it might be interesting to find it so.

This is about any object having similar aphelion and perihelion values to Starman (Elon Musk's Tesla in space) that happens to have a suitably close approach to Earth. Could such an object, if it had "just the right" encounter with Earth acquire Solar escape velocity?

$\endgroup$
13
$\begingroup$

Definitely - it could be ejected. But Earth would only play a minor role.

Starman now counts as a Near Earth Object, being any object crossing Earth's orbit. Any such object is occasionally in Earth's vicinity, when they cross our orbit while we are nearby. The orbits of such objects have now been modeled over time periods of millions of years. From Asteroid Mining 101 by John Lewis, of Deep Space Industries:

These studies revealed that the mean lifetime of an NEA* is about 30 million years, and the main mechanisms for loss of these bodies were impact on a terrestrial planet or perturbations into Jupiter approaching orbits, from which the body could strike Jupiter, or could be ejected from the solar system, or even fall into the Sun.

So, it is by interaction with Jupiter, which has by far the strongest gravitational pull of all the planets, that an object can acquire escape velocity from the solar system.

Over time periods this long, all the orbital perturbations acting on an object, from all the planets, and to a much lesser extent moons and asteroids, causes their orbits to be completely unpredictable. That is to say, the gravitational interactions are so many and so complex, uncertainty accumulates to the point where it is impossible to say where something will be - not just you'll be off by a few percent, it could be anywhere, including no longer in the solar system. So, though Starman's orbit right now will keep looping around nicely in a safe orbit that passes close to Earth and close to Mars now and then, it is entirely possible it will drift into the kind of resonant orbit with Jupiter that will slowly make its orbit more and more elliptical until it just ejects it from the solar system altogether.

There is also the matter of the Yarkovsky effect. Astronomer Jonathan McDowell has been quoted in many places recently talking about the likely outcome. The following is from an article in SpaceFlight Now:

...two forces acting on the car will limit its lifetime. One is Jupiter. The giant planet’s gravity perturbs bodies in the asteroid belt and, over time, will have an effect on the Tesla’s trajectory. The other effect is a subtle acceleration produced by tiny temperature-related forces over extremely long periods that also would act to change the orbit. “It’s tiny, but over timescales of millions of years it’s enough to shrink the orbit and make the thing fall into the sun,” McDowell said. “So it’s a race between does that happen before some Jupiter perturbation ejects it from the system.

*NEA is Near-Earth Asteroid, but of course the orbital mechanics for any object is the same.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe you should emphasize that the chances of a random encounter are very very slim and that you are talking about astronomical time frames (millions of years). I don't know the level of knowledge OP has but when a question like this comes up they are usually thinking in smaller time frames (tens, hundreds, maybe thousands of years) for which the answer is no. $\endgroup$ – Roman Reiner Feb 10 '18 at 6:59
  • $\begingroup$ Also, slightly related. Perturbations can get the Roadster to change orbit, but I think they need to lead to and end in a sudden close encounter before an object can get escape velocity from the Sun. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Feb 10 '18 at 7:47
  • $\begingroup$ @RomanReiner you think that's unclear? It says the lifetime of an NEA is 30 million years, which means it is only after that time that it is likely it will either have impacted something, or been ejected from the solar system. $\endgroup$ – kim holder Feb 10 '18 at 14:11
1
$\begingroup$

According to this paper, it is unlikely:

Hanno Reis, Daniel Tamayo, David Vokrouhlicky. The random walk of cars and their collision probabilities with planets. arXiv:1802.04718:

By running a large ensemble of simulations with slightly perturbed initial conditions, we estimate the probability of a collision with Earth and Venus over the next one million years to be 6% and 2.5%, respectively. We estimate the dynamical lifetime of the Tesla to be a few tens of millions of years.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So, does that mean its most probable fate is a collision with either Earth or Venus, and does it also mean that ejection is not ruled out, just a less likely fate? $\endgroup$ – Anthony X Feb 17 '18 at 3:00
  • $\begingroup$ @AnthonyX In my understanding, it means that a collision with either Earth or Venus is eventually (by far) the most likely fate. It doesn't specifically address the likelihood of ejection from the Solar System. $\endgroup$ – gerrit Feb 17 '18 at 19:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Phys.org's write-up of the ArXiv preprint is also interesting. phys.org/news/2018-02-tesla-shot-space-collide-earth.html $\endgroup$ – uhoh Feb 18 '18 at 3:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.