In this answer I point out that the period of items (ring particles, moons, spacecraft, etc.) around an oblate body will not scale exactly as $a^{3/2}$ because the closer you are to the planet, the stronger the perturbing effects are as a result of being much closer to the near-side of the oblate "ring" than the far side of it. Mathematically that turns out to be $1/r^4$ vs $1/r^2$.
I can mindlessly calculate orbits including the $J_2$ term as shown in this answer using these radial acceleration terms assuming an equatorial orbit:
$$a_0 = -\frac{GM}{r^2},$$
$$a_2 = -\frac{3}{2} J_2 \frac{GM R^2}{r^4},$$
where $a_0$ is the radial acceleration due to the monopole term and $a_2$ is the radial acceleration due to the quadrupole term — that part of the oblateness captured within the $J_2$ coefficient, and $R$ is the normalizing radius of the body used to keep $J_2$ dimensionless.
I can rewrite this as
$$a_{tot} = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \left( 1+\frac{3}{2} J_2 \frac{R^2}{r^2} \right)$$
and just decide that for the circular equatorial case I can set $r$ equal to the semi-major axis and the "effective mass" of the central body is increased by the factor in the parenthesis, but I am not sure if I've done this right, and certainly don't know what to do if the orbit is elliptical and/or inclined.
Question: What would an equation for the period of a circular orbit taking into account $J_2$ look like? Is there something that would include either elliptical and/or inclined orbits as well?
I'm also a bit confused about the mass and its distribution. I'd like to double check that the standard gravitational parameter $GM$ represents all of the mass including that in the equatorial bulge, and that we're not somehow double-counting that by using $J_2$.
A related and (still) unanswered question is For the mathematical relationship between J2 (km^5/s^2) and dimensionless J2 - which one is derived from the other?.