7
$\begingroup$

I was reading the NASA page about Curiosity's crazy landing scheme, and I ran across this sentence:

With a payload this size, the rockets could kick up enough dust to compromise the rover and its instruments

Wait, what? Curiosity has to survive these things:

enter image description here

Moving at around 300-375 mi/hr tops.

Is it true that a simple rocket blast for a few seconds would risk comprimising the rover, while the rover can survive 375 mi/hr gusts of the same sand?

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

Retrorockets could accelerate dust particles and smaller stones to a lot higher velocities than highest recorded wind gusts on the surface of Mars that reached 500 to 600 km/h (300 to 375 mi/h). For example, the Apollo Lunar Modules' descent engines blew out high-velocity lunar particles estimated to have reached speeds of between 0.6 and 1.5 miles per second (up to 5,400 mi/h or 8,690 km/h). Those are over one order of magnitude greater speeds than Martian dust devils or storms were recorded to reach!

"The smallest particles were seen by the Apollo astronauts to fly right out over the horizon and keep on going," said Philip Metzger of NASA's Kennedy Space Center (KSC). "Depending on the actual velocity they may have gone halfway around the moon or more. In most cases they would only travel until they hit a natural terrain feature, such as a crater rim or a mountain range."

Of course, that means that it wouldn't merely be fine grain dust that would be disturbed but the exhaust plumes of retrorockets would also be accelerating higher mass particles, like gravel and pebbles. That would be a whole lot more of sandblasting than rovers would receive even if in the middle of a Martian sand storm. Additionally, a lot of these flying particles of different sizes would be heated up by the retrorocket's exhaust plume at low altitudes, and this heat could be also trapped in an excavated by exhaust plumes crater in the Martian soil, so there'd be even more danger from extreme temperatures that the Curiosity rover wasn't designed for. Sure, the rover could be protected from this heat, but that would add to the total lander's weight, and it was already reaching limits of our capabilities as it is, with the launch weight of roughly 900 kg (2000 lb).

There were also other dangers with using retrorockets on the lander itself (they were of course used on the Sky Crane, but higher above the landing site and the rover was lowered on the ground by a set of cables once the crane reached nearly zero vertical velocity), some of it discussed later in the article you linked to, like the possibility of tipping over or burying the lander too deep in the Martian soil for the rover to safely drive off its ramp, and so on.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Bear in mind that the extremely low density of the Martian atmosphere means that a 375mph wind is a lot less dramatic than that kind of wind speed would be on Earth. Rocket exhaust would definitely kick up larger particles. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Aug 27 '14 at 18:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.