Curiosity drills 6.4 cm (2.5 inch) holes on Mars. Comet harpoons have been proposed for future space probes. There are a number of ways in which we can penetrate the surface of terrestrial bodies, but I'm interested in what is the deepest we've gotten so far. As of April 2018, how deep have we gone (measured in vertical distance below surface)?

(To clarify, by "terrestrial" I mean to include all dwarf planets, comets, asteroids, moons, and terrestrial planets, unless by some marvelous exception it would stretch the definition too far--like a gas dwarf planet, were one to exist.)


In July 2005, the Deep Impact mission released an impactor that excavated a crater, estimated to be 100 meters wide and 30 meters deep, into comet Tempel 1.

Tempel Alive with Light

  • 8
    $\begingroup$ On July 4th no less! $\endgroup$ – Mark Adler Apr 13 '18 at 5:59
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ More curiosity than quibbling, but do comets actually count as terrestrial bodies? $\endgroup$ – Mick O'Hea Apr 13 '18 at 10:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MickO'Hea: Only if they're primarily composed of silicate rocks, and thus "Earth-like" $\endgroup$ – Lightness Races in Orbit Apr 13 '18 at 11:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MickO'Hea Resolved the possible ambiguity in the question. $\endgroup$ – called2voyage Apr 13 '18 at 12:04

Since the question is about terrestrial bodies, maybe the Deep Space 2 mission penetrating about 0.6 m (or 2 ft) into Mars was the deepest. At least that's what it was designed for, but we don't know if it reached that depth.

  • $\begingroup$ They are sending a rover up for this soon for Mars. $\endgroup$ – Muze May 7 '18 at 3:41

The non-comet runner up is probably the crater on the moon created by the impact of the Centaur upper stage from LCROSS. NASA estimated that at "approximately 28m (92 feet) in diameter by 5m (16 feet) deep".

  • $\begingroup$ How does the LCROSS crater compare to the craters from the Saturn V upper stages? $\endgroup$ – Mark Apr 13 '18 at 22:28
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent point! According to lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/60, "The LCROSS impactor (Centaur upper stage) is much smaller than the S-IVB and thus will make a smaller crater." I couldn't find any numbers on depth, but the S-IVB craters are 30-40m wide, so they're probably deeper too. $\endgroup$ – Simon Apr 14 '18 at 18:49

EDIT: didn't realize terrestrial planets means only Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars

EDIT2: wasn't aware the definition of 'surface' for a gas giant related to phase change, not to reaching some arbitrary pressure (e.g. 1 atm)

In 2012 Galileo was crashed into Jupiter and lasted 78 minutes, not clear how they define "penetrate the surface" or "depth" on a gas giant:

It entered the atmosphere of Jupiter at 30 miles per second (46km per second), the highest impact speed ever achieved by a man-made object. Amazingly, Jupiter’s dense atmosphere slowed the craft to 0.07 miles per second (0.12km per second) in just four minutes.

The probe’s heat shield, made of carbon phenolic, was able to withstand the 15,500°C ball of plasma caused by this sudden deceleration, producing light brighter than the Sun’s surface. It remained active for about 78 minutes as it passed through Jupiter’s atmosphere, losing more than half of its mass in the process before being crushed by the huge pressure.

  • $\begingroup$ My understanding is that Jupiter is not a terrestrial body. $\endgroup$ – Everyday Astronaut Apr 13 '18 at 21:17
  • $\begingroup$ @derwodamaso: my mistake $\endgroup$ – smci Apr 13 '18 at 21:21
  • $\begingroup$ Galileo burned in the atmosphere, I wouldn't say it penetrated at all. While it's not clearly defined I would say Jupiter has a surface--but it's far beyond our ability to reach at present. (I would define the point where it goes to metallic hydrogen as a surface.) $\endgroup$ – Loren Pechtel Apr 13 '18 at 23:19
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Terrestrial bodies include terrestrial planets, but also some moons of Jupiter and Saturn, maybe even our moon. The OP's definition goes even further. Nonetheless, I find this answer interesting. $\endgroup$ – Everyday Astronaut Apr 14 '18 at 19:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In planetary science a "surface" is usually considered a location where an essentially discontinuous change in state occurs, i.e. from gas to liquid or solid, or liquid to solid. At Jupiter (and Saturn) the transition to metallic hydrogen appears not to be that localized but instead is a zone hundreds or thousands of km in depth. As you go deeper into Jupiter the temperature rapidly increases, to ~15-20,000 K in the center, way above the critical temperatures of everything, even iron. There's no "surface", anywhere. $\endgroup$ – Tom Spilker May 1 '18 at 19:34

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.