Small (nano) satellites and cubesats are between \$100k and \$500k. What percentage of the total is the cost of the propulsion system?

  • $\begingroup$ What makes you think that nano-satellites have a propulsion system? $\endgroup$ – GdD Apr 14 '18 at 9:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The overwhelming majority of cube and nanosats do not have propulsion systems. You can however buy these systems and the prices are listed here: cubesatshop.com/product-category/propulsion-pressurisation $\endgroup$ – Dragongeek Apr 14 '18 at 13:52

This is an extremely difficult question to answer, firstly CubeSats and Nanosatellites can cost upwards of 5-10 million depending on the mission type, hardware, and organization developing the spacecraft.

Getting into propulsion systems, this is again a very difficult question to answer accuracy, mainly because of the different types of propulsion systems available widely vary in cost. Cold gas systems for rcs are relatively cheap on the order of around 10-15k per thruster, while chemical thrusters can range between 20-500k+ it largely depends on the technology. Moving into electric things get even more tricky, as EP (Electric Propulsion) systems usually cost more then traditional chemical (mono/biprop).

However, in general cold gas thrusters are usually the cheapest, chemical (mono/biprop) are in the middle, and electric are usually the most expensive. In terms of what percent of the spacecraft it is, largely depends on the mission type and size of the spacecraft (CubeSat, 3U vs 12U).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.