Before transitioning to the LOx tests during any new injector development, water is typically used for calculating flow rates, pressure loss, etc.

But testing with water cannot qualify as a suitable substitute for it is highly viscous than LOx. So what is the liquid that is typically suited for these preliminary cold tests?

  • $\begingroup$ Liquid nitrogen is a bit colder (77 to 90 K) and cheap. Argon boils at 87 K. $\endgroup$ – Uwe Jul 1 '18 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ I've never heard of anything being used except water. $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble Jul 1 '18 at 22:06
  • $\begingroup$ @OrganicMarble wouldn't the difference in viscosity translate into difference in flow rate? Or is the discharge coefficient is independent of viscosity? $\endgroup$ – karthikeyan Jul 1 '18 at 22:33

Sutton (7th edition, but the only one online) says

Hydraulic and pneumatic components (valves, pipes, expansion joints) can readily be water flow tested on flow benches and corrected for pressure drops and density (and sometimes also viscosity) to determine their pressure drop at rated flow.

The fairly in-depth book The Saturn F-1 Engine mentions only water flow testing for the F-1. There is a nice picture of an injector test. enter image description here

It appears that some small scale facilities(3 lbm/s) have used LN2.

I couldn't find anything on similarity correction for injectors specifically. This paper discusses it for turbomachinery:

Traditionally, in scaled water flow turbopump testing, it has been considered sufficient to match flow coefficient and cavitation number, which are the key fluid mechanical parameters for cavitation similarity. Strict Reynolds number scaling is deemed unnecessary in rocket turbopump testing as these pumps operate at very high speeds in the fully turbulent regime (Re>10^6 ) where Reynolds effects remain relatively constant.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ But what is the method to correct for viscosity and density? $\endgroup$ – karthikeyan Jul 2 '18 at 7:22
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for the links. I too tried to check for similar work before posting here. Seems you too have not come across any such work! Does this all mean that viscosity correction may not be needed given the flow is very turbulent(at very high Re) and inertial forces are the most dominant forces? $\endgroup$ – karthikeyan Jul 2 '18 at 17:40

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.