-7
$\begingroup$

A modern CPU is 200 gflops. A 1968 computer is 5 mflops. A few weeks to render a minute of footage.

So since there are only a few minutes of physically relevant footage (lunar rover dust trajectory, object movement, oscillations etc) it wouldn't take much it seems. Refute this

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Anthony X, uhoh, Heopps, JCRM, Organic Marble Jul 29 '18 at 11:44

  • This question does not appear to be about space exploration within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

10
$\begingroup$

Your premise is incorrect. Apollo 11 alone generated 3 hours of footage on the surface. The crews had cameras running almost continuously during EVAs (although some of it was at slow speed, down to 1 fps), that requires 75 hours of footage. A list of footage can be found via this answer.

In addition, there were lots of photos, some video in Moon orbit and on the transit from/to the Moon, video during descent and ascent from the Moon. Plus all the audio and telemetry channels (NASA has 19,000 hours of recordings from Apollo 11 alone).

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.